Synthesis, Crystal Structure and Gas Adsorption Properties of Metal-organic Supercontainer Based 2, 6-Naphthalenedicarboxylate Linker

Tian-Pu SHENG Feng-Rong DAI Guo-Zong ZHENG Zhong-Ning CHEN

Citation:  Tian-Pu SHENG, Feng-Rong DAI, Guo-Zong ZHENG, Zhong-Ning CHEN. Synthesis, Crystal Structure and Gas Adsorption Properties of Metal-organic Supercontainer Based 2, 6-Naphthalenedicarboxylate Linker[J]. Chinese Journal of Structural Chemistry, 2021, 40(3): 311-316. doi: 10.14102/j.cnki.0254–5861.2011–2855 shu

Synthesis, Crystal Structure and Gas Adsorption Properties of Metal-organic Supercontainer Based 2, 6-Naphthalenedicarboxylate Linker

English

  • Discrete coordination containers featuring well-defined hollow structures have attracted significant attention in view of their well-organized polyhedral architectures, convenient coordination-driven self-assembly process, as well as promising applications such as gas storage and separation, supramolecular catalysis, molecule recognition, and so on[1-10]. We devote oneself to the development of a new class of coordination containers named metal-organic supercontainers (MOSCs)[10-18], which were built from sulfonylcalix[4]arenes, divalent metal ions, and suitable carboxylate linkers. They feature unique multi-pore architecture containing an endo cavity defined by metal ions-connected carboxylate linkers and sulfonylcalix[4]arenes, and multiple exo cavities from the upper rim of sulfonylcalix[4]arenes. The exo cavity is tunable by chemical modification on the para substituent group of the sulfonylcalix[4]arenes, giving rise to unique selective gas adsorption properties through modulation on the solid-state porosity[10, 19]. On the other hand, by judicious selection of carboxylate linkers, various molecular topologies of MOSCs have been readily achieved. For example, typical MOSCs with the geometries of face-directed octahedron (type I MOSCs)[11], edge-directed octahedron (type II MOSCs)[10], barrel-shaped box (type III MOSCs)[12], and cylindrical structure (type IVMOSCs)[13] were readily achieved using trigonal, linear, angular-planar, and angular-nonplanar carboxylate ligand as linkers, respectively. It has been well studied that elongating the tricarboxylate linkers successfully resulted in remarkable extension of the endo cavity in the face-directed octahedral type I MOSCs[11, 20-22]. In contrast, investigations on elongated edge-directed octahedral type II MOSCs are limited[23].

    Figure 1

    Figure 1.  Structural representations of (a) type I, (b) type II, (c) type III, and (d) type IV MOSCs[10-13]. The yellow sphere serves to guide the eyes

    Type II MOSCs with the 1, 4-benzenedicarboxylate (BDC) ligand as linker exhibited remarkable O2/N2 adsorption selectivity depending on different degree of porosity collapse, which is closely related to different molecular sizes of MOSCs manipulating by para substituent modification on the sulfonylcalix[4]arene precursor[10]. Herein, we present the assembly of a new MOSC using 2, 6-naphthalenedicarboxylate (NDC) ligand as linear ditopic linkers. Replacing the BDC ligand with elongated NDC linker significantly enlarges the molecular size of resulted MOSC, and hence effectively modulates the solid-state porosity and gas adsorption properties.

    Unless otherwise noted, starting materials and solvents were purchased from commercial suppliers and used without further purification. p-tert-Butylsulfonylcalix[4]arene (H4TBSC)[24] was prepared according to the reported procedures. Powder X-ray diffraction results were measured on Rigaku Miniflex with Cu radiation of λ = 1.5405 Å operated at 30 kV at the scan rate of 2 degree/min. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) was obtained from a Netzsch thermal analyzer (model-STA449C) at a heating rate of 5 ℃/min under a constant nitrogen flow. Gas adsorption isotherms were measured using a Micromeritics ASAP3020 instrument based on a volumetric method. Samples were typically washed with methanol and pre-dried on a Schlenk line at 120 ℃ for 8 h before being transferred to pre-weighed analysis tubes which were then capped with seal frits. The samples were degassed under dynamic vacuum (< 6 µmHg) at 120 ℃ for about 24~48 h until the outgas rates were lower than 5 µmHg/min. The analysis tubes containing the evacuated samples were weighed again to determine the sample weights before being transferred back to the analysis port of the instrument. The N2 isotherms were measured at 77 K in a liquid N2 bath using ultra high pure (UHP) grade gas (99.99%), the CH4, C2H2, C2H4 and C2H6 isotherms were measured at 298 K in a dry water bath using ultra high pure (UHP) grade gases (99.99%).

    Co(NO3)2∙6H2O (119.2 mg, 0.4 mmol), 2, 6-naphthalenedicarboxylic acid (43.24 mg, 0.2 mmol) and H4TBSC (84.9 mg, 0.1 mmol) were dissolved in a mixture solvent of dimethylacetamide (DMA) (5 mL) and methanol (1 mL) in a scintillation vial (20 mL capacity). The vial was placed in a sand bath, which was transferred to a programmable oven and heated at a rate of 0.5 ℃/min from 30 to 100 ℃. The temperature was held at 100 ℃ for 24 h before the oven was cooled at a rate of 0.2 ℃/min to the final temperature of 30 ℃. Pink crystals of 1 were formed after one week and isolated by filtration. The crystals were then vacuum dried at 120 ℃ to give rise to 24.67 mg of the activated material (yield: 10%).

    X-ray single-crystal diffraction data were collected on a Bruker D8 Venture diffractometer using IμS 3.0 microfocus source Mo- radiation (λ = 0.71073 Å) and PHOTON II CPAD detector. Frames were integrated with the Bruker SAINT software package (V8.38A) using a SAINT algorithm. Data were corrected for absorption effects using the multi-scan method (SADABS)[25]. The structure was solved and refined using the Bruker SHELXTL Software Package (SHELXT 2014/5), a computer program for automatic solution of crystal structures, and refined by the full-matrix least-squares method with ShelXle Version 4.8.6, a Qt graphical user interface for the SHELXL-2016/6[26, 27]. Hydrogen atoms are obtained by theoretical calculations, and all non-hydrogen atoms were generated by Fourier synthesis and correction by difference electron density function. The electron count due to disordered solvent molecules in the void space of the crystals was calculated using the program SQUEEZE in PLATON software package and refined further using the data generated[28]. SQUEEZE gives 5142 electrons/unit cell for the voids, which are occupied by the solvents (DMA, 48 e and/or CH3OH, 18 e). Taking into account of the TGA data, container 1 can be formulated as [Co4(μ4-H2O)(TBSC)]6(NDC)12·(DMA)25·(CH3OH)76.

    A total of 59011 reflections were collected in the range of 2.28≤θ≤25.00º, of which 18433 were unique (Rint = 0.1203). The empirical formula of container 1 is C384H348Co24O126S24, tetragonal system, space group I4/m, with a = b = 30.9119(19) Å, c = 43.565(3) Å, V = 41628(6) Å3, Dc = 0.731 g/cm3, Mr = 9162.36, Z = 2, F(000) = 9384, μ = 0.566 mm–1, the final GOOF = 1.027, R = 0.0987 and wR = 0.2474 for 7240 observed reflections with I > 2σ(I).

    The new coordination container 1 was prepared from the reaction of p-tert-butylsulfonylcalix[4]arene (TBSC), 2, 6-naphthalenedicarboxylic acid (NDC), and Co(NO3)2∙6H2O in the mixture solvent of DMA and MeOH at 100 ℃ for 24 h (Fig. 2), wherein red block crystals suitable for single-crystal X-ray diffraction (SCXRD) analysis were obtained after one week. As shown in Fig. 3a, the powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) studies indicated the phase purity and crystallinity of the as-synthesized material of 1, however, it lost its crystallinity after removal of solvent molecules, plausibly attributing to partial structural collapse of the activated sample[10]. The thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) (Fig. 3b) revealed the excellent thermal stability of compound 1 with the decomposition temperature higher than 420 ℃. The ca. 25% weight loss observed from the starting point to 300 ℃ was ascribed to the escape of solvent molecules (DMA and/or MeOH).

    Figure 2

    Figure 2.  Synthetic scheme of container 1. The yellow sphere serves to guide the eyes

    Figure 3

    Figure 3.  (a) Experimental measured PXRD patterns of the as-synthesized (black) and activated (red) sample of 1 in comparison with the simulated patterns (blue) from single-crystal structures; (b) TGA of as-synthesized (black) and activated (red) sample of 1

    The SCXRD study revealed that container 1 crystalized in the tetragonal crystal system and I4/m space group as same as the BDC analogue of MOSC-II-tBu-Co[10]. The molecular structure of container 1 adopted an edge-directed octahedral architecture with C4h symmetry, consisting of six TBSC-capped tetranuclear cluster subunits occupying the vertices and twelve NDC bridging ligands locating in edges (Fig. 2 and 4a). In the TBSC-capped tetranuclear unit, the TBSC serves as a tetrakis tridentate ligand to coordinate with the square Co4 cluster through four phenoxo and four sulfonyl O atoms. Each Co(II) ion is octahedrally coordinated with eight oxygen atoms from TBSC (two μ-phenoxo and one sulfonyl O atoms), carboxylate ligand (two oxygen atoms from two carboxylate units), and µ4-H2O. Noticeably, two TBSC-capped tetranuclear units of compound 1 located in the axial position (Fig. 4b) slightly rotated along the C4 axis as compared to the corresponding BDC-based MOSC-II-tBu-Co (Fig. 4c) due to the obvious dislocation of two carboxylate groups in NDC ligand. Additionally, four NDC linkers occupied in the equatorial position are disordered over two positions. With the elongated NDC dicarboxylate linker, the inner and outer dimension of compound 1 (ca. 2.0 and 3.6 nm, respectively) are slightly longer than those of the BDC-based analogue (ca. 1.7 and 3.3 nm, respectively)[10]. The hydrophobic interactions between tert-butyl groups from six adjacent container molecules (Fig. 5) resulted in a pseudo body-centered cubic (bcc) crystal packing in 3D dimension.

    Figure 4

    Figure 4.  Crystal structure of 1 along (a) b axis and (b) c axis, and (c) MOSC-II-tBu-Co[10] along c axis

    Figure 5

    Figure 5.  (a) 2D and (b) 3D packing of 1 through hydrophobic interactions

    The solid porosity was confirmed by the N2 adsorption experiment using activated sample of compound 1. As depicted in Fig. 6a, the adsorption isotherm of N2 at 77 K displayed a "pseudo" type I model indicating the micro porous structure of 1 similar to the MOSC-II-tBu-Co[10]. However, the Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) surface area of 1 (205 cm2/g) was calculated to be only half of MOSC-II-tBu-Co (423 cm2/g) due to more severe degree of porosity collapse after enlarging the molecular size[10]. Gas adsorption experiments of CH4, C2H2, C2H4 and C2H6 were further investigated at 298 K (Fig. 6b). The C2H2 adsorption capacity for 1 is higher than its C2H4 and C2H6 uptake capacities and much higher than its CH4 uptake. At 298 K and 100 kPa, it shows the highest uptake of 22.2 cm3/g for C2H2, which is nearly six times its CH4 adsorption capacity (3.8 cm3/g). Meanwhile, it adsorbs 12.4 cm3/g of C2H4 and 11.6 cm3/g of C2H6 at 298 K and 100 kPa, which are three times its CH4 uptake capacity. The results indicated its potentially relevant application in separation and purification of light hydrocarbons.

    Figure 6

    Figure 6.  (a) N2 isotherm for 1 at 77 K; (b) CH4, C2H2, C2H4 and C2H6 adsorption isotherms of 1 at 298 K

    In conclusion, a new metal-organic supercontainer adopting edge-direct octahedral architecture has been successfully obtained by using p-tert-butylsulfonylcalix[4]arene as the capping ligand and 2, 6-naphthalenedicarboxylate as the bridging ligand. Gas adsorption studies indicated that the new supercontainer is porous and show good adsorption selectivity of C2 hydrocarbons over CH4, suggesting the potential applications of this material for light hydrocarbons adsorption and separation.


    1. [1]

      Cook, T. R.; Stang, P. J. Recent developments in the preparation and chemistry of metallacycles and metallacages via coordination. Chem. Rev. 2015, 115, 7001–7045. doi: 10.1021/cr5005666

    2. [2]

      Duriska, M. B.; Neville, S. M.; Lu, J. Z.; Iremonger, S. S.; Boas, J. F.; Kepert, C. J.; Batten, S. R. Systematic metal variation and solvent and hydrogen-gas storage in supramolecular nanoballs. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 8919–8922. doi: 10.1002/anie.200903863

    3. [3]

      Liu, T. F.; Liu, Y.; Xuan, W. M.; Cui, Y. Chiral nanoscale metal-organic tetrahedral cages: diastereoselective self-assembly and enantioselective separation. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 4121–4124. doi: 10.1002/anie.201000416

    4. [4]

      Jiao, J.; Tan, C.; Li, Z.; Liu, Y.; Han, X.; Cui, Y. Design and assembly of chiral coordination cages for asymmetric sequential reactions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 2251–2259. doi: 10.1021/jacs.7b11679

    5. [5]

      Takezawa, H.; Kanda, T.; Nanjo, H.; Fujita, M. Site-selective functionalization of linear diterpenoids through u-shaped folding in a confined artificial cavity. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 5112–5115. doi: 10.1021/jacs.9b00131

    6. [6]

      Zhao, D.; Yuan, D. Q.; Krishna, R.; van Baten, J. M.; Zhou, H. C. Thermosensitive gating effect and selective gas adsorption in a porous coordination nanocage. Chem. Commun. 2010, 46, 7352–7354. doi: 10.1039/c0cc02771e

    7. [7]

      Sudik, A. C.; Millward, A. R.; Ockwig, N. W.; Côte, A. P.; Kim, J.; Yaghi, O. M. Design, synthesis, structure, and gas (N2, Ar, CO2, CH4, and H2) sorption properties of porous metal-organic tetrahedral and heterocuboidal polyhedra. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 7110–7118. doi: 10.1021/ja042802q

    8. [8]

      Jing, X.; He, C.; Yang, Y.; Duan, C. A metal-organic tetrahedron as a redox vehicle to encapsulate organic dyes for photocatalytic proton reduction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 3967–3974. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5b00832

    9. [9]

      Yang, L.; Jing, X.; He, C.; Chang, Z.; Duan, C. Redox-active M8L6 cubic hosts with tetraphenylethylene faces encapsulate organic dyes for light-driven H2 production. Chem. Eur. J. 2016, 22, 18107–18114. doi: 10.1002/chem.201601447

    10. [10]

      Dai, F. R.; Sambasivam, U.; Hammerstrom, A. J.; Wang, Z. Synthetic supercontainers exhibit distinct solution versus solid state guest-binding behavior J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 7480–7491. doi: 10.1021/ja502839b

    11. [11]

      Dai, F. R.; Wang, Z. Modular assembly of metal-organic supercontainers incorporating sulfonylcalixarenes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 8002–8005. doi: 10.1021/ja300095j

    12. [12]

      Dai, F. R.; Becht, D. C.; Wang, Z. Modulating guest binding in sulfonylcalixarene-based metal-organic supercontainers. Chem. Commun. 2014, 50, 5385–5387. doi: 10.1039/C3CC47420H

    13. [13]

      Dai, F. R.; Qiao, Y.; Wang, Z. Designing structurally tunable and functionally versatile synthetic supercontainers. Inorg. Chem. Front. 2016, 3, 243–249.

    14. [14]

      Bhuvaneswari, N.; Annamalai, K. P.; Dai, F. R.; Chen, Z. N. Pyridinium functionalized coordination containers as highly efficient electrocatalysts for sustainable oxygen evolution. J. Mater. Chem. A 2017, 5, 23559–23565. doi: 10.1039/C7TA05797K

    15. [15]

      Bhuvaneswari, N.; Dai, F. R.; Chen, Z. N. Sensitive and specific guest recognition through pyridinium-modification in spindle-like coordination containers. Chem. Eur. J. 2018, 24, 6580–6585. doi: 10.1002/chem.201705210

    16. [16]

      Sun, C. Z.; Sheng, T. P.; Dai, F. R.; Chen, Z. N. Sulfonylcalixaren-based ortho-dicarboxylate-bridged coordination containers for guest encapsulation and separation. Cryst. Growth Des. 2019, 19, 1144–1148. doi: 10.1021/acs.cgd.8b01633

    17. [17]

      Liu, M.; Liao, W. P.; Hu, C. H.; Du, S. C.; Zhang, H. J. Calixarene-based nanoscale coordination cages. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 1585–1588. doi: 10.1002/anie.201106732

    18. [18]

      Xiong, K.; Jiang, F.; Gai, Y.; Yuan, D.; Chen, L.; Wu, M.; Su, K.; Hong, M. Truncated octahedral coordination cage incorporating six tetranuclear-metal building blocks and twelve linear edges. Chem. Sci. 2012, 3, 2321–2325. doi: 10.1039/c2sc20264f

    19. [19]

      Cheng, L. J.; Fan, X. X.; Li, Y. P.; Wei, Q. H.; Dai, F. R.; Chen, Z. N.; Wang, Z. Engineering solid-state porosity of synthetic supercontainers via modification of exo-cavities. Inorg. Chem. Commun. 2017, 78, 61–64. doi: 10.1016/j.inoche.2017.03.005

    20. [20]

      Du, S.; Hu, C.; Xiao, J. C.; Tan, H.; Liao, W. A giant coordination cage based on sulfonylcalix[4]arenes. Chem Commun. 2012, 48, 9177–9179. doi: 10.1039/c2cc34265k

    21. [21]

      Du, S.; Yu, T. Q.; Liao, W.; Hu, C. Structure modeling, synthesis and X-ray diffraction determination of an extra-large calixarene-based coordination cage and its application in drug delivery. Dalton Trans. 2015, 44, 14394–14402. doi: 10.1039/C5DT01526J

    22. [22]

      Fang, Y.; Lian, X.; Huang, Y.; Fu, G.; Xiao, Z.; Wang, Q.; Nan, B.; Pellois, J. P.; Zhou, H. C. Investigating subcellular compartment targeting effect of porous coordination cages for enhancing cancer nanotherapy. Small 2018, 14, e1802709. doi: 10.1002/smll.201802709

    23. [23]

      Tan, C.; Jiao, J.; Li, Z.; Liu, Y.; Han, X.; Cui, Y. Design and sssembly of a chiral metallosalen-based octahedral coordination cage for supramolecular asymmetric catalysis. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 2085–2090. doi: 10.1002/anie.201711310

    24. [24]

      Iki, N.; Kumagai, H.; Morohashi, N.; Ejima, K.; Hasegawa, M.; Miyanari, S.; Miyano, S. Selective oxidation of thiacalix[4]arenes to the sulfinyl- and sulfonylcalix[4]arenes and their coordination ability to metal ions. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 7559–7562. doi: 10.1016/S0040-4039(98)01645-1

    25. [25]

      Krause, L.; Herbst-Irmer, R.; Sheldrick, G. M.; Stalke, D. Comparison of silver and molybdenum microfocus X-ray sources for single-crystal structure determination. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2015, 48, 3–10. doi: 10.1107/S1600576714022985

    26. [26]

      Hubschle, C. B.; Sheldrick, G. M.; Dittrich, B. ShelXle: a Qt graphical user interface for SHELXL. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2011, 44, 1281–1284. doi: 10.1107/S0021889811043202

    27. [27]

      Sheldrick, G. M. Crystal structure refinement with SHELXL. Acta Cryst. 2015, C71, 3–8.

    28. [28]

      Spek, A. L. Acta Cryst. 2009, D65, 148–155.

  • Figure 1  Structural representations of (a) type I, (b) type II, (c) type III, and (d) type IV MOSCs[10-13]. The yellow sphere serves to guide the eyes

    Figure 2  Synthetic scheme of container 1. The yellow sphere serves to guide the eyes

    Figure 3  (a) Experimental measured PXRD patterns of the as-synthesized (black) and activated (red) sample of 1 in comparison with the simulated patterns (blue) from single-crystal structures; (b) TGA of as-synthesized (black) and activated (red) sample of 1

    Figure 4  Crystal structure of 1 along (a) b axis and (b) c axis, and (c) MOSC-II-tBu-Co[10] along c axis

    Figure 5  (a) 2D and (b) 3D packing of 1 through hydrophobic interactions

    Figure 6  (a) N2 isotherm for 1 at 77 K; (b) CH4, C2H2, C2H4 and C2H6 adsorption isotherms of 1 at 298 K

  • 加载中
计量
  • PDF下载量:  2
  • 文章访问数:  513
  • HTML全文浏览量:  12
文章相关
  • 发布日期:  2021-03-01
  • 收稿日期:  2020-04-17
  • 接受日期:  2020-06-02
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

/

返回文章