Citation: Qinghong Zhang, Qiao Zhao, Xiaodi Wu, Li Wang, Kairui Shen, Yuchen Hua, Cheng Gao, Yu Zhang, Mei Peng, Kai Zhao. Visible-light-induced ring-opening cross-coupling of cycloalcohols with vinylazaarenes and enones via β-C-C scission enabled by proton-coupled electron transfer[J]. Chinese Chemical Letters, ;2025, 36(2): 110167. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2024.110167 shu

Visible-light-induced ring-opening cross-coupling of cycloalcohols with vinylazaarenes and enones via β-C-C scission enabled by proton-coupled electron transfer

    * Corresponding author.
    E-mail address: ias_kzhao@njtech.edu.cn (K. Zhao).
    1 These authors contributed equally to this work.
  • Received Date: 10 April 2024
    Revised Date: 13 June 2024
    Accepted Date: 21 June 2024
    Available Online: 22 June 2024

Figures(6)

  • Pyridyl-based ketones and 1, 6-diketones are both attractive and invaluable scaffolds which play pivotal roles in the construction and structural modification of a plethora of synthetically paramount natural products, pharmaceuticals, organic materials and fine chemicals. In this context, we herein demonstrate an unprecedented, robust and generally applicable synthetically strategy to deliver these two crucial ketone frameworks via visible-light-induced ring-opening coupling reactions of cycloalcohols with vinylazaarenes and enones, respectively. A plausible mechanism involves the selective β-C-C bond cleavage of cycloalcohols enabled by proton-coupled electron transfer and ensuing Giese-type addition followed by single electron reduction and protonation. The synthetic methodology exhibits broad substrate scope, excellent functional group compatibility as well as operational simplicity and environmental friendliness.
  • Two-photon absorption (TPA) is a nonlinear optical (NLO) phenomenon in which two photons are simultaneously absorbed by a molecule, causing excitation under intense laser pulses [1]. Organic molecules with large two-photon absorption cross-sections have occupied a significant position among the numerous classes of nonlinear optical materials due to their abundant substituents, high symmetry and multidimensionality [2-6]. The organic TPA molecules have shown various applications in photonics, optoelectronics, photodynamic therapy and bio-imaging, etc. [7-11].

    Chromophores with strong and universal TPA characteristics are highly desirable for these applications. Numerous studies have shown that triphenylamine derivatives are becoming promising TPA materials [12, 13]. Triphenylamine is a well-known strong electron-rich donator with C3 symmetry and outstanding hole-transporting properties that make it a popular TPA scaffold [14-18]. It has been reported that the central nitrogen introduced electron-withdrawing substituents at three pare-positions would be beneficial to obtaining efficient TPA fluorophores [19, 39]. Zhou's group synthesized six multi-branched triphenylamine derivatives with the different numbers of the electron-donating group isophorone's branch and applied them in the study of linear and nonlinear optical properties [20]. They noted that TPA cross-sections increased with the electron-donating group's branch number. The compound with C3 symmetry and the largest number of branches has the highest TPA cross-section. Suzuki et al. reported the comprehensive investigation of the influence of monosubstituted on two-photon absorption for diphenylacetylene derivatives [21]. Hu synthesized two conjugated organic molecules with excellent TPA properties and emphasized the equal importance of the high TPA cross-section, fluorescent emission and heat dissipation for designing functional TPA molecules [22].

    For plenty of small organic molecules, the molecular nonlinearities originate from delocalized electrons in their π-conjugated systems. More abundant and structurally diverse molecules are added with electron-donor (D) and electron-acceptor (A) groups to the ends or centers of the π-conjugated backbone, which can favor electron delocalization and help the excitation of molecules from the ground state to an excited state [23-27]. These simple and effective designs enable chromophores to have large TPA cross-sections to expand the development of NLO materials [28-32]. The electron transfer or electron separation in these D-A-containing systems of triphenylamine-based derivatives endowed this class of chromophores with highly anisotropic and interesting photophysical properties. Numerous triphenylamine derivatives with dipolar chromophores were synthesized to explore the structure and TPA property relationships by introducing various donor-π-acceptor systems, different π-bridging centers and donor-acceptor strengths [33-35]. It is well known from the literature that electron-withdrawing groups of triphenylamine derivatives mainly focused on cyano, benzothiazole, nitro, and so on could enhance two-photon absorption [36-38]. These organic chromophores, especially with asymmetrical structures and large dipole moments may lead to reduced optical nonlinearity [20]. Consequently, improving molecular symmetry and weakening molecular dipole-dipole interactions were important for enhancing the nonlinear optical properties of chromophores. Aromatic hydrocarbons could be effectively reduced the electron cloud density and weakened polarizability by introducing the most non-metallic fluorine atom. Fluorinated aromatic rings were valuable groups with strong electron-withdrawing effects and large steric hindrances, which could prepare chromophores with push-pull systems. Additionally, fluorinated aromatic rings could play an important role in the nonlinear optical chromophores due to their high thermal stability, low dielectric constants, and good optical transparency [40, 41]. However, studies on fluorinated aromatic rings as the electron-withdrawing groups are rarely reported.

    Herein, we designed and synthesized two triphenylamine-based TPA molecules: star-shaped ((A-π-)3D) (T1) [42] and star-shaped ((D-A-π-)3D) (T2) molecules (Fig. 1a). The single-crystal structures of T1 and T2 grown from different solvents were obtained. Triphenylamine was chosen as the core to construct branched molecules and indicated prominent electron-donating ability. Pentafluorobenzene (ArF) unit as an electron acceptor was then introduced at three pare-positions to the central nitrogen forming (A-π-)3D model structure. The electron transfer between the triphenylamine and ArF contributes to the interesting linear or nonlinear photophysical properties of T1. This also implies that the star-shaped ((A-π-)3D) structures could offer substantial delocalization of π-electrons and controllable charge separation.

    Figure 1

    Figure 1.  (a) Chemical structures of molecules T1 and T2. (b) The corresponding single-crystal structures of T1 and T2 from different solutions. (c) The crystal-packing arrangement of T1 and T2.

    Based on the chromophore of T1, extending the π-electron conjugated system and improving the solubility by introducing N, N-dimethyl to the pentafluorobenzene lead to T2 [43]. T2 was chosen to investigate the effects of the π-conjugated spacer length on the optical properties. The N, N-dimethyl as an electron-donating group will make the whole structure more balanced in charge recombination and change the polarizability of electrons in frontier molecular orbitals. T1 and T2 show typical intramolecular charge transfer (ICT) effects. Whereas, the optical properties (especially two-photon absorption and two-photon excited fluorescence) of these compounds have not been investigated in-depth, let alone the influence of structures on photophysical properties. Therefore, we systematically analyzed their linear and nonlinear optical properties and further explored the relationship between structure and optical properties. When compared with other reports, this work showed that both T1 and T2 demonstrated excellent TPA phenomenon in CH2Cl2, especially at low power (Table S1 in Supporting information). Moreover, T2 exhibits more remarkable nonlinear optical absorption effects with the TPA cross-section up to 4.24 × 107 GM. Theoretical DFT computational indicates that the bulky ArF group and long conjugation length contribute to improved TPA and emission activity really. The synthesis of T1 and T2 is very straightforward. T1 and T2 were synthesized by a two-step reaction to give the final products (Scheme S1 in Supporting information). For the synthesis details, see the supporting information. Both T1 and T2 show good solubility in common organic solvents.

    T1 and T2 could be easily crystallized from different solvents. The single crystals of molecules T1 and T2 suitable for X-ray diffraction analysis were successfully obtained. T1 was grown by the slow evaporation of n-hexane into CH2Cl2 solution at room temperature. While the single crystal of T2 was acquired through evaporation of tetrahydrofuran solution, CH2Cl2 solution or cooling down the toluene solution slowly. As shown in Figs. 1b and c, the single-crystal X-ray diffraction confirms the molecular structures and spatial arrangements of T1 and T2 (T1, T2, T2_CH2Cl2, T2_toluene). The single-crystal structures of T1 and T2 with or without solvent molecules. For the structure of T1, the crystal structure belongs to the P1 space group with unit cell parameters of a = 11.61 Å, b = 12.12 Å, c = 12.94 Å, α = 94.80˚, β = 99.38˚, γ = 109.11˚. A clear 2D layered structure was observed. In each layer, the T1 molecules were arranged in a head-to-tail formation to form a 1D thread first. The 1D threads were then arranged in a head-to-head formation alternately to form a 2D layer. The T2 crystal belonged to space group P1 and the unit cell parameters are a = 9.67 Å, b = 13.71 Å, c = 16.33 Å, α = 103.38˚, β = 90.88˚, γ = 104.04˚. Crystal T2 has the almost same self-assembly mode as T1, although T2 was obtained from tetrahydrofuran (THF). For the crystal of T2_CH2Cl2, a slightly different packing mode was adopted, and some subtle slippage between some 1D threads was observed. The 2D layered structure was still achieved in the end. The crystal of T2_CH2Cl2 belonged to space group P1, with unit cell parameters a = 11.94 Å, b = 13.47 Å, c = 14.14 Å, α = 88.21˚, β = 72.92˚, γ = 89.83˚. However, for the crystal of T2_toluene with a solvent molecule of toluene, a completely different packing mode was adopted. More interspace in each 2D layer was observed. The crystal of T2_toluene also belonged to space group P1, with unit cell parameters a = 10.79 Å, b = 13.58 Å, c = 17.73 Å, α = 68.57˚, β = 72.97˚, γ = 74.49˚. The supporting information provides detailed information about the single-crystal X-ray diffraction data.

    All the crystals belonged to space group P1 with a propeller-shaped structure, which is a typical feature of triphenylamine derivatives. The dihedral angles between the benzene rings of central triphenylamine and peripheral phenyl ring with N, N-dimethyl is 21.37˚ in T2_CH2Cl2, whereas the dihedral angles located in the same positions are 38.23˚ in T2, 29.38˚ in T2_toluene (Fig. S1 in Supporting information). The dihedral angles between the benzene rings of central triphenylamine and pentafluorobenzene rings are 31.08˚ in T1 (Fig. S1). These results showed that the crystal of T2_CH2Cl2 possessed better planarity than other crystals. Therefore, the electron mobility in the conjugate system was increased as well as the TPA cross-section. The better planarity of T2_CH2Cl2 is beneficial to light absorption properties, which was consistent with the experimental results.

    The photophysical properties of T1 and T2 were studied. The UV-vis absorption spectra of the T1 and T2 exhibit two distinct maximum absorption peaks at 283 and 400 nm for T1, 319 and 405 nm for T2 in CH2Cl2 solution (Fig. 2a). The lower wavelengths in the high-energy region are assigned to the absorption of the π-π* transitions caused by the triphenylamine core. The higher wavelength peaks are ascribed to the absorption of the intramolecular charge transfer (ICT). T2 shows a slight red-shift at the maximum absorption peaks. This is a characteristic behavior of ICT bands induced by the electron-donating group of N, N-dimethyl. Besides, two chromophores have nearly independent on the nature of the solvent (Fig. S2 in Supporting information). According to the UV-vis spectra, the bandgap of T1 and T2 were calculated to be 2.79 eV and 2.76 eV, respectively (Fig. S3 in Supporting information). The fluorescence emission spectra of T1 and T2 displayed the maximum emission of 499 and 504 nm (Fig. 2b). The fluorescence intensity of T2 was slightly higher than T1. The emission spectra of T1 and T2 in CH2Cl2 followed a similar trend to that observed for the absorption spectra. As shown in Fig. S4 (Supporting information), the solid-state UV-vis spectra revealed that four crystals showed a broad absorption range from 350 nm to 450 nm. Solid-state fluorescence spectra of crystals of T1 and T2 displayed the maximum emission of 489 and 515 nm.

    Figure 2

    Figure 2.  (a) UV-vis absorption spectra and (b) fluorescence spectra of T1 and T2 in CH2Cl2 (1.0 × 10−5 mol/L). (c) TPA emission spectra of T1 and T2 under the excitation of an 800 nm femtosecond laser and their comparison.

    Two-photon excited fluorescence experiments were performed by using 60-fs pulses from a Ti: sapphire laser operating at 800 nm with the repetition rate of 80 MHz. The strong green-fluorescent photon emissions of two molecules can be observed, as shown in Fig. 2c. T1 and T2 exhibit maximum fluorescent emission features at 493 and 497 nm, respectively, which means both molecules emit photons with significantly higher energy than that of their excitation photon. Since the UV-visible absorption of the two compounds displays almost no absorption above 460 nm, this indicates that the fluorescence emission creased by femtosecond laser pulse arises from a nonlinear optical two-photon absorption process. Additionally, at the same excitation intensities, the fluorescence intensity of T2 was stronger than T1. The stronger emission ability of T2 meant a better TPA efficiency than T1. The crystals of T1 and T2 exhibited maximum fluorescent emission features at 501 and 503 nm under the excitation of an 800 nm femtosecond laser, which indicated that all crystals had a nonlinear optical absorption phenomenon (Fig. S4). However, due to the rough surfaces of prepared solid fibrous samples, many lasers were lost seriously in the OA Z-scan experiment. The nonlinear optical parameters of the crystals could not be measured accurately. The electrochemical studies have been performed, however, the cyclic voltammetry (CV) curves indicated the irreversible electrode process of two chromophores. T2 (0.86 V) had a lower onset oxidation potential than T1 (0.97 V), due to the introduced electron-donating groups N, N-dimethyl (Fig. S5 in Supporting information).

    To obtain the frontier molecular orbital information of chromophores T1 and T2. In this study, density functional theory (DFT) calculations were carried out on two compounds using Gaussian 03 software with B3LYP/6-311G (d, p) basis sets [44]. The geometries, as well as the HOMO/LUMO and ground-state dipole moments, are shown in Fig. S6 (Supporting information). The higher HOMO level of T2 is in good agreement with the electrochemical results and confirms that T2 presents a lower onset oxidation potential. The HOMO and LUMO diagrams clearly show a typical ICT process in the two compounds. In the triphenylamine core, the electron clouds of the HOMO are evenly distributed. Although the electron clouds of the HOMO are evenly distributed in the triphenylamine core, the majority of electron clouds of the LUMO are transferred and evenly distributed in the branched. The energy gaps ΔE calculated by DFT for chromophores T1-T2 were 3.012 eV and 2.965 eV, respectively. The ΔE indicated that chromophores T2 has a bigger maximum absorption wavelength in UV-vis spectra, which is consistent with the results of experimental UV-vis spectra analysis.

    The nonlinear optical properties of the T1 and T2 were measured by the open aperture (OA) Z-scan technique. The schematic of the experimental setup was shown in Fig. S7 (Supporting information). In this open aperture Z-scan experiment, the light source was the 800 nm Ti: Sapphire femtosecond laser, samples were held in a quartz cuvette with 1 mm path length and the pulses are focused into the sample cell with a 200 mm focal length lens. Upon moving the sample cell along the beam across the focal point, the transmittance beam was detected by using a silicon photodetector. More details of other OA Z-scan experimental datasets are provided in Table S2 (Supporting information).

    Under these conditions, the observed large NLA of two chromophores mainly resulted from the molecules themselves because the CH2Cl2 did not express any nonlinearity used for the nonlinear absorption measurement. It is well known that as the sample approaches the focal point, nonlinear effects will appear due to high intensity/fluence [45]. Different nonlinear mechanisms can lead to the decrease of sample transmittance (reverse saturation absorption (RSA)) or to the increase of sample transmittance (saturable absorption (SA)) [46, 47]. The transition energies (between S0 and S1) of the two chromophores (T1, T2) were calculated to be 3.011 and 2.935 eV, respectively. When excited at 800 nm (1.55 eV), electrons in the ground state simultaneously absorbing two photons can be excited to the excited state. In addition, since the wavelength of 800 nm locates outside the absorption band of two chromophores, one-photon-induced excited-state absorption can be negligible. Hence, TPA is the main mechanism for two chromophores at 800 nm. The normalized transmission profiles of T1 and T2 with a concentration of 1.0 × 10−5 mol/L in CH2Cl2 (Fig. 3). The experimental curves of the two chromophores under different excitation intensities show interesting regularities. The curves exhibit an RSA process induced by TPA with a valley located at zero position (focal point). The TPA will be enhanced with the increasing excitation intensity while the transmittance should decrease. However, as the excitation intensity increased from 0.0088 GW/cm2 to 0.0885 GW/cm2, the transmittance increased from 0.991 to 0.996. The abnormal phenomenon may be originated from the saturation of TPA. Electrons are excited to the excited state during the TPA process. The higher the excitation intensity means the higher the electron density. An additional SA component decreases the TPA and increases the transmittance. A similar regularity has also been observed for T2. The TPA process becomes saturated at high excitation intensity. The saturation of TPA implies that electrons with high density can be excited to the excited state. Thus, both chromophores possess excellent TPA properties. In addition, the nonlinear absorptive valley of T2 is extra broadened compared with T1 signifying an improvement in the nonlinear optical properties.

    Figure 3

    Figure 3.  OA Z-scan results for (a) T1 and (b) T2 at different excitation intensities at the focal point I0 = 0.0031 GW/cm2, 0.0088 GW/cm2, 0.0442 GW/cm2, 0.0885 GW/cm2. The circles are experimental results. The solid lines show the theoretical fitting.

    The TPA coefficients (β) of two molecules can be calculated from the numerical fitting of normalized OA Z-scan transmission, which is described in Eq. 1 [48]:

    (1)

    where the free factor Z0 is the diffraction length of the beam, Leff is the effective length of the sample and I is the maximum on-axis intensity in the focus (z = 0). α0 denotes the linear absorption coefficient and I represents the thickness of the sample. As shown in Fig. 3, the measured curves can be well fitted by Eq. 1, so that the TPA coefficients can be extracted. The β values of two chromophores shown reduced gradually with excitation intensities increasing (Fig. 4). These results infer that both chromophores possess excellent TPA properties. Since electrons with high density can be excited to the excited state, which can in turn reduce the TPA ability due to the saturation of TPA and the saturation effect of TPA strengthened with the increasing excitation intensity. In addition, β values of T2 are bigger than T1 at the same conditions. T2 has a more remarkable TPA ability. TPA performance could be greatly enhanced by adjusting the pentafluorobenzene electron-donating or N, N-dimethyl withdrawing groups.

    Figure 4

    Figure 4.  Measured effective TPA coefficient β of T1 and T2 as functions of intensity.

    Furthermore, the TPA cross-section (σ) could be determined through the Z-scan measurements by Eq. 2 [49]:

    (2)

    where h is Planck's constant, ν is the frequency of input intensity, NA is the number density of molecules in units of cm−3 (0.01 mmol/L in the current case), and d is the molar concentration of the solution. The results of the nonlinear absorption parameters measured are summarized in Table S1. It has been shown that extended π-conjugation could lead to greater densities of populations for both electronic and vibrational states, providing more effective coupling channels, which would in turn increase the TPA cross-section. The TPA cross-section values of T2 are bigger than T1 under the same conditions, which implies that it is possible to increase the two-photon absorption properties of T2 by extending the π-conjugation by simply including N, N-dimethyl. Both chromophores possessed excellent two-photon absorption σ values at very low input intensity, while T2 has the largest σ values up to 4.24 × 107 GM at excitation intensity of 0.0031 GW/cm2. By modulating the structures of the conjugated organic molecules as chromophores, excellent nonlinear properties could be obtained.

    In summary, we have systematically studied the nonlinear optical properties of two novel star-type of triphenylamine derivatives. Two chromophores exhibited superior two-photon absorption properties with large TPA cross-sections up to 4.24 × 107 GM at 800 nm, suggesting that molecular structures offer a wide range of possibilities for two-photon applications. The DFT calculations help significantly in the fundamental understanding of the ICT characteristics of T1 and T2. Accordingly, molecules based on the molecular platform of triphenylamine might be able to have even larger TPA cross-sections. This study makes it easier to create novel two-photon absorption-based nonlinear optical devices in the future.

    The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 51972185, 12174211, 11874232 and 31202117), the Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (No. ZR2020ZD38).

    Supplementary material associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at doi:10.1016/j.cclet.2022.107880.


    1. [1]

      X.Y. Yu, J.R. Chen, W.J. Xiao, Chem. Rev. 121 (2021) 506–561.  doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00030

    2. [2]

      I. Marek, A. Masarwa, P. Delaye, M. Leibeling, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 54 (2015) 414–429.  doi: 10.1002/anie.201405067

    3. [3]

      S.P. Morcillo, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 58 (2019) 14044–14054.  doi: 10.1002/anie.201905218

    4. [4]

      Y.F. Liang, M. Bilal, L.Y. Tang, et al., Chem. Rev. 123 (2023) 12313–12370.  doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.3c00219

    5. [5]

      C.Y. Huang, J. Li, C.J. Li, Chem. Sci. 13 (2022) 5465–5504.  doi: 10.1039/d2sc00202g

    6. [6]

      O.O. Sokolova, J.F. Bower, Chem. Rev. 121 (2021) 80–109.  doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00166

    7. [7]

      R. Vicente, Chem. Rev. 121 (2021) 162–226.  doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00151

    8. [8]

      S. Zhu, P. Zhu, M. Guo, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 35 (2024) 108835–108838.  doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2023.108835

    9. [9]

      H. Yan, G.S. Smith, F.E. Chen, Green. Synth. Catal. 3 (2022) 219–226.  doi: 10.1016/j.gresc.2022.05.007

    10. [10]

      Q. Zhang, S. Zhou, C. Shi, L. Yin, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60 (2021) 26351–26356.  doi: 10.1002/anie.202110709

    11. [11]

      S.B. Park, J.K. Cha, Org. Lett. 2 (2000) 147–149.  doi: 10.1021/ol991250r

    12. [12]

      Z. Ye, X. Cai, J. Li, M. Dai, ACS Catal. 8 (2018) 5907–5914.  doi: 10.1021/acscatal.8b00711

    13. [13]

      D.C. Davis, K.L. Walker, C. Hu, R.N. Zare, R.M. Waymouth, M. Dai, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138 (2016) 10693–10699.  doi: 10.1021/jacs.6b06573

    14. [14]

      X. Zhou, S. Yu, L. Kong, X. Li, ACS Catal. 6 (2016) 647–651.  doi: 10.1021/acscatal.5b02414

    15. [15]

      M. Lee, J. Heo, D. Kim, S. Chang, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 144 (2022) 3667–3675.  doi: 10.1021/jacs.1c12934

    16. [16]

      K. Cheng, P.J. Walsh, Org. Lett. 15 (2013) 2298–2301.  doi: 10.1021/ol4008876

    17. [17]

      H. Zhang, G. Wu, H. Yi, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 56 (2017) 3945–3950.  doi: 10.1002/anie.201612138

    18. [18]

      P. Wu, M. Jia, W. Lin, S. Ma, Org. Lett. 20 (2018) 554–557.  doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.7b03637

    19. [19]

      S. Zhai, S. Qiu, S. Yang, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 34 (2003) 107657–107660.

    20. [20]

      Y.F. Wang, S. Chiba, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131 (2009) 12570–12572.  doi: 10.1021/ja905110c

    21. [21]

      H.J. Zhao, X.F. Fan, J.J. Yu, C. Zhu, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137 (2015) 3490–3493.  doi: 10.1021/jacs.5b00939

    22. [22]

      R. Ren, H. Zhao, L. Huan, C. Zhu, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 54 (2015) 12692–12696.  doi: 10.1002/anie.201506578

    23. [23]

      K. Jia, F. Zhang, H. Huang, Y. Chen, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138 (2016) 1514–1517.  doi: 10.1021/jacs.5b13066

    24. [24]

      S. Wang, L. Guo, H. Wang, X.H. Duan, Org. Lett. 17 (2015) 4798–4801.  doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.5b02353

    25. [25]

      Z.G. Ren, W.L. Yu, H.X. Zheng, P.F. Xu, Org. Lett. 25 (2023) 93–98.  doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.2c03894

    26. [26]

      L. Zhao, Q. Zhong, J. Tian, et al., Org. Lett. 24 (2022) 4421–4426.  doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.2c01649

    27. [27]

      C. Lou, X. Wang, L. Lv, Z. Li, Org. Lett. 23 (2021) 7608–7612.  doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.1c02824

    28. [28]

      P. Gao, H. Wu, J.C. Yang, L. Guo, Org. Lett. 21 (2019) 7104–7108.  doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.9b02675

    29. [29]

      L. Chang, Q. An, L. Duan, K. Feng, Z. Zuo, Chem. Rev. 122 (2022) 2429–2486.  doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00256

    30. [30]

      J. Xuan, X.K. He, W.J. Xiao, Chem. Soc. Rev. 49 (2020) 2546–2556.  doi: 10.1039/c9cs00523d

    31. [31]

      X. Wu, C. Zhu, Chem. Commun. 55 (2019) 9747–9756.  doi: 10.1039/c9cc04785a

    32. [32]

      A.A.M.A. El Gehani, H.A. Maashi, J. Harnedy, L.C. Morrill, Chem. Commun. 59 (2023) 3655–3664.  doi: 10.1039/d3cc00302g

    33. [33]

      N. Jha, P. Mishra, M. Kapur, Org. Chem. Front. 10 (2023) 4941–4971.  doi: 10.1039/d3qo01090b

    34. [34]

      S. Bloom, D.D. Bume, C.R. Pitts, T. Lectka, Chem. Eur. J. 21 (2015) 8060–8063.  doi: 10.1002/chem.201501081

    35. [35]

      Y. Ge, Y. Shao, S. Wu, et al., ACS Catal. 13 (2023) 3749–3756.  doi: 10.1021/acscatal.3c00230

    36. [36]

      S. Wu, J. Li, R. He, K. Jia, Y. Chen, Org. Lett. 23 (2021) 9204–9209.  doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.1c03526

    37. [37]

      M. Ji, Z. Wu, C. Zhu, Chem. Commun. 55 (2019) 2368–2371.  doi: 10.1039/c9cc00378a

    38. [38]

      X. Fan, H. Zhao, J. Yu, X. Bao, C. Zhu, Org. Chem. Front. 3 (2016) 227–232.  doi: 10.1039/C5QO00368G

    39. [39]

      D. Wang, J. Mao, C. Zhu, Chem. Sci. 9 (2018) 5805–5809.  doi: 10.1039/c8sc01763h

    40. [40]

      R. Ren, Z. Wu, Y. Xu, C. Zhu, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 55 (2016) 2866–2869.  doi: 10.1002/anie.201510973

    41. [41]

      E. Ota, H. Wang, N.L. Frye, R.R. Knowles, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141 (2019) 1457–1462.  doi: 10.1021/jacs.8b12552

    42. [42]

      H.G. Yayla, H.J. Wang, K.T. Tarantino, H.S. Orbe, R.R. Knowles, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138 (2016) 10794–10797.  doi: 10.1021/jacs.6b06517

    43. [43]

      K. Zhao, K. Yamashita, J.E. Carpenter, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141 (2019) 8752–8757.  doi: 10.1021/jacs.9b03973

    44. [44]

      Ł. Woźniak, G. Magagnano, P. Melchiorre, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 57 (2018) 1068–1072.  doi: 10.1002/anie.201711397

    45. [45]

      L. Huang, T. Ji, M. Rueping, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142 (2020) 3532–3539.  doi: 10.1021/jacs.9b12490

    46. [46]

      T. Ji, X.Y. Chen, L. Huang, M. Rueping, Org. Lett. 22 (2020) 2579–2583.  doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.0c00493

    47. [47]

      A. Hu, Y. Chen, J.J. Guo, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140 (2018) 13580–13585.  doi: 10.1021/jacs.8b08781

    48. [48]

      K. Zhang, L. Chang, Q. An, X. Wang, Z. Zuo, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141 (2019) 10556–10564.  doi: 10.1021/jacs.9b05932

    49. [49]

      L. Wen, J. Ding, L. Duan, et al., Science 382 (2023) 458–464.  doi: 10.1126/science.adj0040

    50. [50]

      Y. Chen, J. Du, Z. Zuo, Chem 6 (2020) 266–279.  doi: 10.1016/j.chempr.2019.11.009

    51. [51]

      J. Guo, A. Hu, Y. Chen, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 55 (2016) 15319–15322.  doi: 10.1002/anie.201609035

    52. [52]

      Z. Yang, D. Yang, J. Zhang, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 144 (2022) 13895–13902.  doi: 10.1021/jacs.2c05520

    53. [53]

      B. Wang, H. Li, L. Wang, Y.G. Liu, J. Wu, Chem. Catal. 2 (2022) 2096–2105.  doi: 10.1016/j.checat.2022.07.002

    54. [54]

      T. Xue, Z. Zhang, R. Zeng, Org. Lett. 24 (2022) 977–982.  doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.1c04365

    55. [55]

      J. Wang, B. Huang, C. Shi, C. Yang, W. Xia, J. Org. Chem. 83 (2018) 9696–9706.  doi: 10.1021/acs.joc.8b01225

    56. [56]

      D.R. Weinberg, C.J. Gagliardi, J.F. Hull, et al., Chem. Rev. 112 (2012) 4016–4093.  doi: 10.1021/cr200177j

    57. [57]

      P.R.D. Murray, J.H. Cox, N.D. Chiappini, et al., Chem. Rev. 122 (2022) 2017–2291.  doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00374

    58. [58]

      E. Tsui, H. Wang, R.R. Knowles, Chem. Sci. 11 (2020) 11124–11141.  doi: 10.1039/d0sc04542j

    59. [59]

      Z. Zhou, X. Kong, T. Liu, Chin. J. Org. Chem. 41 (2021) 3844–3879.  doi: 10.6023/cjoc202106001

    60. [60]

      Y. Zhang, Y. Niu, Y. Guo, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 61 (2022) e202212201.  doi: 10.1002/anie.202212201

    61. [61]

      J.J. Li, Heterocyclic Chemistry in Drug Discovery, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ, 2013.

    62. [62]

      E. Vitaku, D.T. Smith, J.T. Njardarson, J. Med. Chem. 57 (2014) 10257–10274.  doi: 10.1021/jm501100b

    63. [63]

      Z. Ma, D.C.H. Lin, R. Sharma, et al., Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 26 (2016) 15–20.  doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2015.11.050

    64. [64]

      A.Y. Guan, C.L. Liu, X.F. Sun, Y. Xie, M.A. Wang, Bioorg. Med. Chem. 24 (2016) 342–353.  doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2015.09.031

    65. [65]

      A.E. Goetz, N.K. Garg, Nat. Chem. 5 (2013) 54–60.  doi: 10.1038/nchem.1504

    66. [66]

      M. Vellakkaran, T. Kim, S. Hong, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 61 (2022) e202113658.  doi: 10.1002/anie.202113658

    67. [67]

      M. Kong, Y. Tan, X. Zhao, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 143 (2021) 4024–4031.  doi: 10.1021/jacs.1c01073

    68. [68]

      Y. Yin, Y. Dai, H. Jia, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140 (2018) 6083–6087.  doi: 10.1021/jacs.8b01575

    69. [69]

      K. Cao, S.M. Tan, R. Lee, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141 (2019) 5437–5443.  doi: 10.1021/jacs.9b00286

    70. [70]

      K.N. Lee, Z. Lei, M.Y. Ngai, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139 (2017) 5003–5006.  doi: 10.1021/jacs.7b01373

    71. [71]

      D.S. Hays, G.C. Fu, J. Org. Chem. 63 (1998) 6375–6381.  doi: 10.1021/jo9809130

    72. [72]

      Y. Miyahara, Y.N. Ito, J. Org. Chem. 79 (2014) 6801–6807.  doi: 10.1021/jo5006137

    73. [73]

      S. Sarkar, A. Banerjee, W. Yao, E.V. Patterson, M.Y. Ngai, ACS Catal. 9 (2019) 10358–10364.  doi: 10.1021/acscatal.9b03570

    74. [74]

      J. Tormo, D.S. Hays, G.C. Fu, J. Org. Chem. 63 (1998) 201–202.  doi: 10.1021/jo971574y

    75. [75]

      M. Larsen, H. Kromann, A. Kharazmi, S.F. Nielsen, Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 15 (2005) 4858–4861.  doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2005.07.012

    76. [76]

      B.V. Pati, A. Ghosh, P.C. Ravikumar, Org. Lett. 22 (2020) 2854–2860.  doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.0c00967

    77. [77]

      T. Fujiwara, Y. Tsuruta, K. Arizono, T. Takeda, Synlett (1997) 962–964.  doi: 10.1055/s-1997-970

    78. [78]

      I. Ryu, M. Ikebe, N. Sonoda, et al., Tetrahedron Lett. 41 (2000) 5689–5692.  doi: 10.1016/S0040-4039(00)00925-4

    79. [79]

      H.Q. Xiao, X.Z. Shu, K.G. Ji, C.Z. Qi, Y.M. Liang, Catal. Commun. 10 (2009) 1824–1827.  doi: 10.1016/j.catcom.2009.06.008

    80. [80]

      I. Ryu, K. Matsumoto, Y. Kameyana, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 115 (1993) 12330–12339.  doi: 10.1021/ja00079a013

    81. [81]

      I. Ryu, M. Ando, A. Ogawa, S. Murai, N. Sonoda, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 105 (1983) 7192–7194.  doi: 10.1021/ja00362a041

    82. [82]

      Y.H. Zhang, W.W. Zhang, Z.Y. Zhang, K. Zhao, T.P. Loh, Org. Lett. 21 (2019) 5101–5105.  doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.9b01703

    83. [83]

      B. Giese, H. Horler, W. Zwick, Tetrahedron Lett. 23 (1982) 931–934.  doi: 10.1016/S0040-4039(00)86986-5

    84. [84]

      B. Giese, H. Horler, Tetrahedron 41 (1985) 4025–4037.  doi: 10.1016/S0040-4020(01)97181-9

    85. [85]

      N. Iwasawa, S. Hayakawa, M. Funahashi, K. Isobe, K. Narasaka, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 66 (1993) 819–827.  doi: 10.1246/bcsj.66.819

    86. [86]

      C. Liu, J. Wang, X. Liu, J. Feng, D. Du, Chem. Commun. 59 (2023) 13175–13178  doi: 10.1039/d3cc04765b

    1. [1]

      X.Y. Yu, J.R. Chen, W.J. Xiao, Chem. Rev. 121 (2021) 506–561.  doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00030

    2. [2]

      I. Marek, A. Masarwa, P. Delaye, M. Leibeling, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 54 (2015) 414–429.  doi: 10.1002/anie.201405067

    3. [3]

      S.P. Morcillo, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 58 (2019) 14044–14054.  doi: 10.1002/anie.201905218

    4. [4]

      Y.F. Liang, M. Bilal, L.Y. Tang, et al., Chem. Rev. 123 (2023) 12313–12370.  doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.3c00219

    5. [5]

      C.Y. Huang, J. Li, C.J. Li, Chem. Sci. 13 (2022) 5465–5504.  doi: 10.1039/d2sc00202g

    6. [6]

      O.O. Sokolova, J.F. Bower, Chem. Rev. 121 (2021) 80–109.  doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00166

    7. [7]

      R. Vicente, Chem. Rev. 121 (2021) 162–226.  doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00151

    8. [8]

      S. Zhu, P. Zhu, M. Guo, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 35 (2024) 108835–108838.  doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2023.108835

    9. [9]

      H. Yan, G.S. Smith, F.E. Chen, Green. Synth. Catal. 3 (2022) 219–226.  doi: 10.1016/j.gresc.2022.05.007

    10. [10]

      Q. Zhang, S. Zhou, C. Shi, L. Yin, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60 (2021) 26351–26356.  doi: 10.1002/anie.202110709

    11. [11]

      S.B. Park, J.K. Cha, Org. Lett. 2 (2000) 147–149.  doi: 10.1021/ol991250r

    12. [12]

      Z. Ye, X. Cai, J. Li, M. Dai, ACS Catal. 8 (2018) 5907–5914.  doi: 10.1021/acscatal.8b00711

    13. [13]

      D.C. Davis, K.L. Walker, C. Hu, R.N. Zare, R.M. Waymouth, M. Dai, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138 (2016) 10693–10699.  doi: 10.1021/jacs.6b06573

    14. [14]

      X. Zhou, S. Yu, L. Kong, X. Li, ACS Catal. 6 (2016) 647–651.  doi: 10.1021/acscatal.5b02414

    15. [15]

      M. Lee, J. Heo, D. Kim, S. Chang, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 144 (2022) 3667–3675.  doi: 10.1021/jacs.1c12934

    16. [16]

      K. Cheng, P.J. Walsh, Org. Lett. 15 (2013) 2298–2301.  doi: 10.1021/ol4008876

    17. [17]

      H. Zhang, G. Wu, H. Yi, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 56 (2017) 3945–3950.  doi: 10.1002/anie.201612138

    18. [18]

      P. Wu, M. Jia, W. Lin, S. Ma, Org. Lett. 20 (2018) 554–557.  doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.7b03637

    19. [19]

      S. Zhai, S. Qiu, S. Yang, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 34 (2003) 107657–107660.

    20. [20]

      Y.F. Wang, S. Chiba, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131 (2009) 12570–12572.  doi: 10.1021/ja905110c

    21. [21]

      H.J. Zhao, X.F. Fan, J.J. Yu, C. Zhu, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137 (2015) 3490–3493.  doi: 10.1021/jacs.5b00939

    22. [22]

      R. Ren, H. Zhao, L. Huan, C. Zhu, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 54 (2015) 12692–12696.  doi: 10.1002/anie.201506578

    23. [23]

      K. Jia, F. Zhang, H. Huang, Y. Chen, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138 (2016) 1514–1517.  doi: 10.1021/jacs.5b13066

    24. [24]

      S. Wang, L. Guo, H. Wang, X.H. Duan, Org. Lett. 17 (2015) 4798–4801.  doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.5b02353

    25. [25]

      Z.G. Ren, W.L. Yu, H.X. Zheng, P.F. Xu, Org. Lett. 25 (2023) 93–98.  doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.2c03894

    26. [26]

      L. Zhao, Q. Zhong, J. Tian, et al., Org. Lett. 24 (2022) 4421–4426.  doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.2c01649

    27. [27]

      C. Lou, X. Wang, L. Lv, Z. Li, Org. Lett. 23 (2021) 7608–7612.  doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.1c02824

    28. [28]

      P. Gao, H. Wu, J.C. Yang, L. Guo, Org. Lett. 21 (2019) 7104–7108.  doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.9b02675

    29. [29]

      L. Chang, Q. An, L. Duan, K. Feng, Z. Zuo, Chem. Rev. 122 (2022) 2429–2486.  doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00256

    30. [30]

      J. Xuan, X.K. He, W.J. Xiao, Chem. Soc. Rev. 49 (2020) 2546–2556.  doi: 10.1039/c9cs00523d

    31. [31]

      X. Wu, C. Zhu, Chem. Commun. 55 (2019) 9747–9756.  doi: 10.1039/c9cc04785a

    32. [32]

      A.A.M.A. El Gehani, H.A. Maashi, J. Harnedy, L.C. Morrill, Chem. Commun. 59 (2023) 3655–3664.  doi: 10.1039/d3cc00302g

    33. [33]

      N. Jha, P. Mishra, M. Kapur, Org. Chem. Front. 10 (2023) 4941–4971.  doi: 10.1039/d3qo01090b

    34. [34]

      S. Bloom, D.D. Bume, C.R. Pitts, T. Lectka, Chem. Eur. J. 21 (2015) 8060–8063.  doi: 10.1002/chem.201501081

    35. [35]

      Y. Ge, Y. Shao, S. Wu, et al., ACS Catal. 13 (2023) 3749–3756.  doi: 10.1021/acscatal.3c00230

    36. [36]

      S. Wu, J. Li, R. He, K. Jia, Y. Chen, Org. Lett. 23 (2021) 9204–9209.  doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.1c03526

    37. [37]

      M. Ji, Z. Wu, C. Zhu, Chem. Commun. 55 (2019) 2368–2371.  doi: 10.1039/c9cc00378a

    38. [38]

      X. Fan, H. Zhao, J. Yu, X. Bao, C. Zhu, Org. Chem. Front. 3 (2016) 227–232.  doi: 10.1039/C5QO00368G

    39. [39]

      D. Wang, J. Mao, C. Zhu, Chem. Sci. 9 (2018) 5805–5809.  doi: 10.1039/c8sc01763h

    40. [40]

      R. Ren, Z. Wu, Y. Xu, C. Zhu, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 55 (2016) 2866–2869.  doi: 10.1002/anie.201510973

    41. [41]

      E. Ota, H. Wang, N.L. Frye, R.R. Knowles, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141 (2019) 1457–1462.  doi: 10.1021/jacs.8b12552

    42. [42]

      H.G. Yayla, H.J. Wang, K.T. Tarantino, H.S. Orbe, R.R. Knowles, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138 (2016) 10794–10797.  doi: 10.1021/jacs.6b06517

    43. [43]

      K. Zhao, K. Yamashita, J.E. Carpenter, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141 (2019) 8752–8757.  doi: 10.1021/jacs.9b03973

    44. [44]

      Ł. Woźniak, G. Magagnano, P. Melchiorre, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 57 (2018) 1068–1072.  doi: 10.1002/anie.201711397

    45. [45]

      L. Huang, T. Ji, M. Rueping, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142 (2020) 3532–3539.  doi: 10.1021/jacs.9b12490

    46. [46]

      T. Ji, X.Y. Chen, L. Huang, M. Rueping, Org. Lett. 22 (2020) 2579–2583.  doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.0c00493

    47. [47]

      A. Hu, Y. Chen, J.J. Guo, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140 (2018) 13580–13585.  doi: 10.1021/jacs.8b08781

    48. [48]

      K. Zhang, L. Chang, Q. An, X. Wang, Z. Zuo, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141 (2019) 10556–10564.  doi: 10.1021/jacs.9b05932

    49. [49]

      L. Wen, J. Ding, L. Duan, et al., Science 382 (2023) 458–464.  doi: 10.1126/science.adj0040

    50. [50]

      Y. Chen, J. Du, Z. Zuo, Chem 6 (2020) 266–279.  doi: 10.1016/j.chempr.2019.11.009

    51. [51]

      J. Guo, A. Hu, Y. Chen, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 55 (2016) 15319–15322.  doi: 10.1002/anie.201609035

    52. [52]

      Z. Yang, D. Yang, J. Zhang, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 144 (2022) 13895–13902.  doi: 10.1021/jacs.2c05520

    53. [53]

      B. Wang, H. Li, L. Wang, Y.G. Liu, J. Wu, Chem. Catal. 2 (2022) 2096–2105.  doi: 10.1016/j.checat.2022.07.002

    54. [54]

      T. Xue, Z. Zhang, R. Zeng, Org. Lett. 24 (2022) 977–982.  doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.1c04365

    55. [55]

      J. Wang, B. Huang, C. Shi, C. Yang, W. Xia, J. Org. Chem. 83 (2018) 9696–9706.  doi: 10.1021/acs.joc.8b01225

    56. [56]

      D.R. Weinberg, C.J. Gagliardi, J.F. Hull, et al., Chem. Rev. 112 (2012) 4016–4093.  doi: 10.1021/cr200177j

    57. [57]

      P.R.D. Murray, J.H. Cox, N.D. Chiappini, et al., Chem. Rev. 122 (2022) 2017–2291.  doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00374

    58. [58]

      E. Tsui, H. Wang, R.R. Knowles, Chem. Sci. 11 (2020) 11124–11141.  doi: 10.1039/d0sc04542j

    59. [59]

      Z. Zhou, X. Kong, T. Liu, Chin. J. Org. Chem. 41 (2021) 3844–3879.  doi: 10.6023/cjoc202106001

    60. [60]

      Y. Zhang, Y. Niu, Y. Guo, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 61 (2022) e202212201.  doi: 10.1002/anie.202212201

    61. [61]

      J.J. Li, Heterocyclic Chemistry in Drug Discovery, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ, 2013.

    62. [62]

      E. Vitaku, D.T. Smith, J.T. Njardarson, J. Med. Chem. 57 (2014) 10257–10274.  doi: 10.1021/jm501100b

    63. [63]

      Z. Ma, D.C.H. Lin, R. Sharma, et al., Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 26 (2016) 15–20.  doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2015.11.050

    64. [64]

      A.Y. Guan, C.L. Liu, X.F. Sun, Y. Xie, M.A. Wang, Bioorg. Med. Chem. 24 (2016) 342–353.  doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2015.09.031

    65. [65]

      A.E. Goetz, N.K. Garg, Nat. Chem. 5 (2013) 54–60.  doi: 10.1038/nchem.1504

    66. [66]

      M. Vellakkaran, T. Kim, S. Hong, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 61 (2022) e202113658.  doi: 10.1002/anie.202113658

    67. [67]

      M. Kong, Y. Tan, X. Zhao, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 143 (2021) 4024–4031.  doi: 10.1021/jacs.1c01073

    68. [68]

      Y. Yin, Y. Dai, H. Jia, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140 (2018) 6083–6087.  doi: 10.1021/jacs.8b01575

    69. [69]

      K. Cao, S.M. Tan, R. Lee, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141 (2019) 5437–5443.  doi: 10.1021/jacs.9b00286

    70. [70]

      K.N. Lee, Z. Lei, M.Y. Ngai, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139 (2017) 5003–5006.  doi: 10.1021/jacs.7b01373

    71. [71]

      D.S. Hays, G.C. Fu, J. Org. Chem. 63 (1998) 6375–6381.  doi: 10.1021/jo9809130

    72. [72]

      Y. Miyahara, Y.N. Ito, J. Org. Chem. 79 (2014) 6801–6807.  doi: 10.1021/jo5006137

    73. [73]

      S. Sarkar, A. Banerjee, W. Yao, E.V. Patterson, M.Y. Ngai, ACS Catal. 9 (2019) 10358–10364.  doi: 10.1021/acscatal.9b03570

    74. [74]

      J. Tormo, D.S. Hays, G.C. Fu, J. Org. Chem. 63 (1998) 201–202.  doi: 10.1021/jo971574y

    75. [75]

      M. Larsen, H. Kromann, A. Kharazmi, S.F. Nielsen, Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 15 (2005) 4858–4861.  doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2005.07.012

    76. [76]

      B.V. Pati, A. Ghosh, P.C. Ravikumar, Org. Lett. 22 (2020) 2854–2860.  doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.0c00967

    77. [77]

      T. Fujiwara, Y. Tsuruta, K. Arizono, T. Takeda, Synlett (1997) 962–964.  doi: 10.1055/s-1997-970

    78. [78]

      I. Ryu, M. Ikebe, N. Sonoda, et al., Tetrahedron Lett. 41 (2000) 5689–5692.  doi: 10.1016/S0040-4039(00)00925-4

    79. [79]

      H.Q. Xiao, X.Z. Shu, K.G. Ji, C.Z. Qi, Y.M. Liang, Catal. Commun. 10 (2009) 1824–1827.  doi: 10.1016/j.catcom.2009.06.008

    80. [80]

      I. Ryu, K. Matsumoto, Y. Kameyana, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 115 (1993) 12330–12339.  doi: 10.1021/ja00079a013

    81. [81]

      I. Ryu, M. Ando, A. Ogawa, S. Murai, N. Sonoda, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 105 (1983) 7192–7194.  doi: 10.1021/ja00362a041

    82. [82]

      Y.H. Zhang, W.W. Zhang, Z.Y. Zhang, K. Zhao, T.P. Loh, Org. Lett. 21 (2019) 5101–5105.  doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.9b01703

    83. [83]

      B. Giese, H. Horler, W. Zwick, Tetrahedron Lett. 23 (1982) 931–934.  doi: 10.1016/S0040-4039(00)86986-5

    84. [84]

      B. Giese, H. Horler, Tetrahedron 41 (1985) 4025–4037.  doi: 10.1016/S0040-4020(01)97181-9

    85. [85]

      N. Iwasawa, S. Hayakawa, M. Funahashi, K. Isobe, K. Narasaka, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 66 (1993) 819–827.  doi: 10.1246/bcsj.66.819

    86. [86]

      C. Liu, J. Wang, X. Liu, J. Feng, D. Du, Chem. Commun. 59 (2023) 13175–13178  doi: 10.1039/d3cc04765b

  • 加载中
    1. [1]

      Yue SunLiming YangYaohang ChengGuanghui AnGuangming Li . Pd(I)-catalyzed ring-opening arylation of cyclopropyl-α-aminoamides: Access to α-ketoamide peptidomimetics. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2024, 35(6): 109250-. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2023.109250

    2. [2]

      Rong-Nan YiWei-Min He . Visible light/copper catalysis enabled radial type ring-opening of sulfonium salts. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2025, 36(4): 110787-. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2024.110787

    3. [3]

      Yi LiuZhe-Hao WangGuan-Hua XueLin ChenLi-Hua YuanYi-Wen LiDa-Gang YuJian-Heng Ye . Photocatalytic dicarboxylation of strained C–C bonds with CO2 via consecutive visible-light-induced electron transfer. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2024, 35(6): 109138-. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2023.109138

    4. [4]

      Peiyan ZhuYanyan YangHui LiJinhua WangShiqing Li . Rh(Ⅲ)‐Catalyzed sequential ring‐retentive/‐opening [4 + 2] annulations of 2H‐imidazoles towards full‐color emissive imidazo[5,1‐a]isoquinolinium salts and AIE‐active non‐symmetric 1,1′‐biisoquinolines. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2024, 35(10): 109533-. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2024.109533

    5. [5]

      Qin ChengMing HuangQingqing YeBangwei DengFan Dong . Indium-based electrocatalysts for CO2 reduction to C1 products. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2024, 35(6): 109112-. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2023.109112

    6. [6]

      Shengkai LiYuqin ZouChen ChenShuangyin WangZhao-Qing Liu . Defect engineered electrocatalysts for C–N coupling reactions toward urea synthesis. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2024, 35(8): 109147-. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2023.109147

    7. [7]

      Junmeng LuoQiongqiong WanSuming Chen . Chemistry-driven mass spectrometry for structural lipidomics at the C=C bond isomer level. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2025, 36(1): 109836-. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2024.109836

    8. [8]

      Zheyu LiHuwei LiYao LiXinyu FuHongxia YueQingxing YangJing FengXinyu WangHongjie Zhang . The effect of electron-phonon coupling on the photoluminescence properties of zinc-based halides. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2025, 36(4): 109800-. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2024.109800

    9. [9]

      Qiongqiong WanYanan XiaoGuifang FengXin DongWenjing NieMing GaoQingtao MengSuming Chen . Visible-light-activated aziridination reaction enables simultaneous resolving of C=C bond location and the sn-position isomers in lipids. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2024, 35(4): 108775-. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2023.108775

    10. [10]

      Guoju GuoXufeng LiJie MaYongjia ShiJian LvDaoshan Yang . Photocatalyst/metal-free sequential C–N/C–S bond formation: Synthesis of S-arylisothioureas via photoinduced EDA complex activation. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2024, 35(11): 110024-. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2024.110024

    11. [11]

      Shan-Shan LiJuan LuoShu-Nuo LiangDan-Na ChenLi-Ning ChenCheng-Xue PanPeng-Ju Xia . Efficient and regioselective C=S bond difunctionalization through a three-component radical relay strategy. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2025, 36(6): 110424-. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2024.110424

    12. [12]

      Zhen LiuZhi-Yuan RenChen YangXiangyi ShaoLi ChenXin Li . Asymmetric alkenylation reaction of benzoxazinones with diarylethylenes catalyzed by B(C6F5)3/chiral phosphoric acid. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2024, 35(5): 108939-. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2023.108939

    13. [13]

      Jinpeng DuJunlin ChenYulong ShanTongliang ZhangYu SunZhongqi LiuXiaoyan ShiWenpo ShanYunbo YuHong He . Insight into the effects of C3H6 on fresh and hydrothermally aged Cu-SSZ-39 catalysts. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2025, 36(3): 110019-. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2024.110019

    14. [14]

      Ke-Ai Zhou Lian Huang Xing-Ping Fu Li-Ling Zhang Yu-Ling Wang Qing-Yan Liu . Fluorinated metal-organic framework for methane purification from a ternary CH4/C2H6/C3H8 mixture. Chinese Journal of Structural Chemistry, 2023, 42(11): 100172-100172. doi: 10.1016/j.cjsc.2023.100172

    15. [15]

      Dong-Xue Jiao Hui-Li Zhang Chao He Si-Yu Chen Ke Wang Xiao-Han Zhang Li Wei Qi Wei . Layered (C5H6ON)2[Sb2O(C2O4)3] with a large birefringence derived from the uniform arrangement of π-conjugated units. Chinese Journal of Structural Chemistry, 2024, 43(6): 100304-100304. doi: 10.1016/j.cjsc.2024.100304

    16. [16]

      Yi LuoLin Dong . Multicomponent remote C(sp2)-H bond addition by Ru catalysis: An efficient access to the alkylarylation of 2H-imidazoles. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2024, 35(10): 109648-. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2024.109648

    17. [17]

      Yang LiYanan DongZhihong WeiChangzeng YanZhen LiLin HeYuehui Li . Fluoride-promoted Ni-catalyzed cyanation of C–O bond using CO2 and NH3. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2025, 36(5): 110206-. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2024.110206

    18. [18]

      Xiangyang JiYishuang ChenPeng ZhangShaojia SongJian LiuWeiyu Song . Boosting the first C–H bond activation of propane on rod-like V/CeO2 catalyst by photo-assisted thermal catalysis. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2025, 36(5): 110719-. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2024.110719

    19. [19]

      Yuemin ChenYunqi WuGuoao WangFeihu CuiHaitao TangYingming Pan . Electricity-driven enantioselective cross-dehydrogenative coupling of two C(sp3)-H bonds enabled by organocatalysis. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2024, 35(9): 109445-. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2023.109445

    20. [20]

      Jiayu Huang Kuan Chang Qi Liu Yameng Xie Zhijia Song Zhiping Zheng Qin Kuang . Fe-N-C nanostick derived from 1D Fe-ZIFs for Electrocatalytic oxygen reduction. Chinese Journal of Structural Chemistry, 2023, 42(10): 100097-100097. doi: 10.1016/j.cjsc.2023.100097

Metrics
  • PDF Downloads(5)
  • Abstract views(592)
  • HTML views(22)

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索
Address:Zhongguancun North First Street 2,100190 Beijing, PR China Tel: +86-010-82449177-888
Powered By info@rhhz.net

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return