Citation: Li Yingxue, Zeng Bo, Yang Yujie, Liang Huageng, Yang Yanbing, Yuan Quan. Design of high stability thin-film transistor biosensor for the diagnosis of bladder cancer[J]. Chinese Chemical Letters, ;2020, 31(6): 1387-1391. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2020.03.043 shu

Design of high stability thin-film transistor biosensor for the diagnosis of bladder cancer

    * *Corresponding authors at:Key Laboratory of Analytical Chemistry for Biology and Medicine (Ministry of Education), College of Chemistry and Molecular Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China.
    ** Corresponding author.
    E-mail address: leonard19800318@hust.edu.cn (H.Liang), yangyanbing@whu.edu.cn (Y.Yang), yuanquan@whu.edu.cn (Q.Yuan).
    1 These authors contributed equally to this work.
  • Received Date: 14 January 2020
    Revised Date: 9 March 2020
    Accepted Date: 15 March 2020
    Available Online: 18 March 2020

Figures(5)

  • Bladder cancer is the most common malignant tumor in the urinary system, with high morbidity, mortality and recurrence after surgery. However, current bladder cancer urine diagnosis methods are limited by the low accuracy and specificity due to the low abundance of bladder cancer biomarkers in the urine with complex biological environments. Herein, we present a high stability indium gallium zinc oxide field effect transistor (IGZO-FET) biosensor for efficient identification of bladder cancer biomarkers from human urine samples. The recognition molecular functionalized IGZO-FET biosensor exhibits stable electronic and sensing performance due to the large-area fabrication of IGZO thin-film FET. Owing to the excellent electrical performance of IGZO-FET, the IGZO-FET biosensor exhibits high sensitivity and extremely low detection limit (2.7 amol/L) towards bladder cancer biomarkers. The IGZO-FET biosensor is also able to directly detect bladder tumor biomarker in human urine with high sensitivity and specificity, and could differentiate bladder cancer patients' urine samples from healthy donors effectively. These results indicate that our designed high-performance biosensor shows great potential in the application of portable digital bladder cancer diagnosis devices.
  • Efficient synthesis of novel macrocyclic hosts with unique structures and good host–guest properties is a permanent and challenging topic in the field of supramolecular chemistry [1-7]. During the last decade, considerable effort has been devoted to the development of macrocyclic molecular and a number of new macrocyclic receptors with novel properties have been reported, such as heterocalix[n]aromatics [8-10], pillar[n]arene [11-16], helicarenes [17-19], naphthotubes [20-24], Ex-box and Ex-cage [25-32], and others [33-37]. However, most of the reported macrocyclic hosts showed poor solubility and weak host–guest interactions in water. To develop a new macrocyclic molecule with good water solubility and molecular recognition properties not only helps us to understand and mimic the biological processes, but also enriches the toolbox of supramolecular chemists. Water soluble groups including sulfonate [38-40], carboxylate [41-43] and quaternary amine groups [44, 45] have been modified onto the macrocyclic hosts to increase their water solubility. These approaches often suffer from long synthetic steps and low yields, which restrict their further application in the complicated supramolecular self-assembly. Undoubtedly, it is important to develop novel water-soluble macrocyclic hosts that could be obtained in high yields and show good host–guest properties in water. Recently, Li and coworkers [46, 47] reported the efficient synthesis of water-soluble macrocyclic hosts using dynamic covalent chemistry (DCC) approach. In their method, both macrocycles and [2] catenanes could be obtained in high yields under the thermodynamic control. However, the purification of [2] catenanes need chromatographic. Previously, our group [42, 43] prepared a novel water-soluble cylindrical macrotricyclic host, and found that the host could bind two N-methylquinolinium salts to form 1:2 complexes in water. Inspired by these results, we deduced that whether we could find a new strategy to construct novel water-soluble macrocyclic host with significant host–guest properties in high yields.

    So far as we know, 1, 8-bis(4-pyridylethynyl)anthracene, which looks like a molecule "clip", has been used as donor building block to prepare trigonal prisms [48]. Thus, the anthracene-based "clip" could also serve as half part of a macrocycle and a macrocyclic host could be obtained when a suitable building block was introduced to this clip. Herein, we report the efficient synthesis of a novel water soluble macrocyclic host 12+·2Br and its complexation with neutral guests in water. By the utilization of the anthracene-based "clip" to react with 1, 4-bis(bromomethyl)benzene, host 12+·2Br can be obtain via simple filtration in a high yield of 82%. Moreover, it was found that host 12+·2Br could form 1:1 complexes with guests 2 and 3 in water solution (Fig. 1). Interestingly, we discovered that host 12+·2Br could only selectively accommodate naphthalene among a variety of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in water. This selective host-guest recognition could be employed for the further removal of naphthalene from sewage.

    Figure 1

    Figure 1.  Structures and the proton designations of host 12+·2Br, guests 2 and 3.

    Synthesis of host 12+·2Br was outlined in Scheme 1. Compound 4 was first prepared according to the literature procedure [48]. By the reaction of 4 and commercially available 1, 4-bis(bromomethyl)benzene in acetonitrile at 90 ℃, host 12+·2Br could be easily synthesized in 82% yield. Macrocyclic host 12+·2Br showed moderate solubility in water, and its structure was confirmed by 1H NMR, 13C NMR, HRMS spectra and crystal structure analysis (Supporting information).

    Scheme 1

    Scheme 1.  Synthesis of host 12+·2Br.

    Firstly, the binding properties of host 12+·2Br toward neutral guests 2 and 3 were investigated by 1H NMR spectra in water solution. Unlike the previous results that reported by our group [43], after electron-poor host 12+·2Br (4.0 mmol/L) and electron-rich guest 2 with 1:1 molar ratio were mixed in water, no obviously color change was observed. The similar phenomenon was also observed for the aqueous solution between host 12+·2Br and guests 3. These results led us to doubt that whether host 12+·2Br could form of complexes with guests 2 and 3. Consequently, the 1H NMR experiments were carried out to further investigate the complexation between host 12+·2Br and guest 2 in water. As shown in Fig. 2, the 1H NMR spectrum of a 1:1 mixture of 12+·2Br and 2 in D2O showed a great difference with those for free host 12+·2Br and free guest 2. Upfield shifts of the resonances of protons H1, H2 and H3 corresponding to guest 2 were observed, which indicated that the naphthalene unit of 2 experienced a shielded magnetic environment in the aromatic cavity of 12+·2Br. Moreover, the signal of protons Hf and Hg in host 12+·2Br also shifted upfield, implying that the electron-poor pyridine unit of 12+·2Br was in shielded magnetic environment and a new complex 1·2 could be formed. Meanwhile, by increasing the amount of guest 2, the spectrum of complex 1·2 showed only one set of resonances, which indicated that the complexation and decomplexation between host 12+·2Br and guest 2 were a fast exchange process on the NMR time scale at room temperature. The formation of complex 1·2 was also supported by 2D NOESY spectral experiment. As shown in the Fig. S4 (Supporting information), the clear correlation signals between protons H1-Hg, H2-Hg and the protons of crown ether units of host 12+·2Br were observed, which was also consistent with the formation of complex 1·2. Moreover, 1H NMR titrations and nonlinear fitting were then performed to quantitatively estimate the 1:1 binding manner between host 12+·2Br and guest 2. Consequently, it was found that 1:1 complex 1·2 were formed by the mole ratio plot. The binding constant (K) of the complex 212+·2Br was calculated to be 184±4 L/mol by the Scatchard plot [49]. By the counteranion exchange of 12+·2Br, we also prepared oil-soluble 12+·2PF6 and investigated its complexation with 2 in MeCN. As shown in Fig. S3 (Supporting information), the 1H NMR spectrum of the 1:1 mixture of 12+·2PF6 and 2 was essentially the sum of the two components, indicating that no obvious complexation between 12+·2PF6 and 2 occurred and the major driving force for the formation of 212+·2Br in water could be hydrophobic interactions. In addition, the binding constant of the complex 312+·2Br was measured to be around 64±2 L/mol in D2O at 298 K. Compared to guest 2 containing a naphthalene unit, guest 3 has a smaller phenyl hydrophobic moiety, which accounted for its lower binding constant within host 12+·2Br.

    Figure 2

    Figure 2.  Partial 1H NMR spectra (400 MHz, D2O, 295 K) of (a) free guest 2, (b) 12+·2Br and 1.0 equiv. of 2, (c) free host 12+·2Br. [12+·2Br]0=4.0 mmol/L.

    The attempts to obtain the single crystal of 212+·2Br and 12+·2Br were unsuccessful. Fortunately, a yellow single crystal of 12+·2PF6 was obtained by slow vapor diffusion of ether to a solution of 12+·2PF6 in CH3CN, providing unambiguous evidence for the formation of 12+·2Br. As shown in Fig. 3a, the two pyridinium residues orientate in a face-to-face nanner and the distance between two N and C atoms of pyridinium residues are measured to be 5.812 Å (h) and 5.647 Å (g), indicating the moderate-sized cavity of host 12+·2PF6. Interestingly, it was found that PF6 ion showed not only multiple CH···F hydrogen bonds but also anion···π interactions with pyridinium rings with the distance of 2.989 (d), 3.062 (e) and 3.159 (f), respectively. Moreover, π···π interaction between two anthracene groups of host 12+·2PF6 with a distance of 3.846 Å (i) was also observed (Fig. 3b). Because of these multiple noncovalent interactions, the macrocyclic molecule 12+·2PF6 could self-assemble to form a 1D tubular channel with PF6 ions inside the channels.

    Figure 3

    Figure 3.  Crystal structure of 12+·2PF6 (a). Crystal structure of self-assembly 12+·2PF6 side view (b), top view (c). Dashed lines denote the noncovalent interactions between the two components. CH···F hydrogen bond distances (Å): a=2.461, b=2.404, c=2.557. PF6 ions and hydrogen atoms not involved in the noncovalent interactions are omitted for clarity.

    Inspired by the formation of complex 1·2 in water, we further investigated the capability of 12+·2Br to accommodate a variety of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in water. As shown in Fig. 4a, 1H NMR spectroscopy revealed that 12+·2Br can encapsulate naphthalene to formation of 1:1 complex. However, the formation of 1:1 complexes between 12+·2Br and anthracene, phenanthrene, triphenylene, pyrene and perylene were not observed (Figs. 4b–f). These observations could be explained by the fact that host 12+·2Br had a small cavity and could only recognize small polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons such as naphthalene. However, because of the extremely poor solubility of naphthalene in water, the corresponding binding constants of host 12+·2Br and naphthalene could not be determined. The highly selective binding behavior of host 12+·2Br toward naphthalene could be further used for the separation of naphthalene from a variety of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons.

    Figure 4

    Figure 4.  Partial 1H NMR spectra (400 MHz, D2O, 298 K) of 12+·2Br after addition of a variety of water-insoluble guests including (a) naphthalene, (b) anthracene, (c) phenanthrene, (d) triphenylene, (e) pyrene and (f) perylene. All the spectra were recorded after sonicating the corresponding suspensions for no less than 24 h to allow the host–guest complexation to reach the equilibrium. The resonance signals of the guests are labelled with red arrows.

    In conclusion, by taking advantage of anthracene-based "clip" structure, we developed an efficient approach to construct a water-soluble macrocycle and studied its binding ability toward neutral guests containing naphthalene or phenyl units in water. The formation of 1:1 complexes between host 12+·2Br and 2 or 3 were confirmed by the 1H NMR titrations experiment. Additionally, we demonstrated that the major driving force for the formation of 212+·2Br or 312+·2Br in water might be hydrophobic interactions. We further investigated its ability to host a variety of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in aqueous solution. It was found that host 12+·2Br could selectively encapsulate of naphthalene to formation of 1:1 complexes over a variety of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. This highly selective accommodation hydrophobic guest in water could be explained by the fact that host 12+·2Br had a relatively small hydrophobic cavity. The application of this novel water-soluble host for the separation of naphthalene from a variety of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and removal of naphthalene from sewage, are underway in our laboratory.

    The authors report no declarations of interest.

    The authors are grateful for the financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 21602055 and 51772091); Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province (No. 2017JJ3094) and Research Foundation of Education Bureau of Hunan Province (No. 18C1072).

    Supplementary material related to this article can be found, in the online version, at doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cclet.2020.11.019.


    * Corresponding author.
    E-mail address: zengfei@iccas.ac.cn (F. Zeng).
    1. [1]

      A.K. Schneider, M.F. Chevalier, L. Derré, Nat. Rev. Urol. 16(2019) 613-630.  doi: 10.1038/s41585-019-0226-y

    2. [2]

      S. Antoni, J. Ferlay, I. Soerjomataram, A. Znaor, A. Jemal, F. Bray, Eur. Urol. 71(2017) 96-108.  doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.06.010

    3. [3]

      B.W.G. van Rhijn, H.G. van der Poel, T.H. van der Kwast, Eur. Urol. 47(2005) 736-748.  doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2005.03.014

    4. [4]

      X. Zhang, Y. Zhang, X. Liu, et al., Oncotarget 7(2015) 3255-3266.
       

    5. [5]

      S. Goodison, C.J. Rosser, V. Urquidi, Mol. Diagn. Ther. 17(2013) 71-84.  doi: 10.1007/s40291-013-0023-x

    6. [6]

      A. Mitra, R. Cote, Nat. Rev. Urol. 7(2010) 11-20.  doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2009.236

    7. [7]

      S. Jeong, Y. Park, Y. Cho, Y.R. Kim, H. Kim, Clin. Chim. Acta 414(2012) 93-100.  doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2012.08.018

    8. [8]

      K.K. Pasikanti, K. Esuvaranathan, P.C. Ho, et al., J. Proteome Res. 9(2010) 2988-2995.  doi: 10.1021/pr901173v

    9. [9]

      A. Sreekumar, L. Poisson, T. Rajendiran, et al., Nature 457(2009) 910-914.  doi: 10.1038/nature07762

    10. [10]

      G.Siravegna, S.Marsoni, S. Siena, et al., Nat.Rev.Clin.Oncol.14(2017) 531-548.  doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2017.14

    11. [11]

      E. Crowley, F.D. Nicolantonio, F. Loupakis, A. Bardelli, Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 10(2013) 472-484.  doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2013.110

    12. [12]

      S. Zhang, R. Geryak, J. Geldmeier, et al., Chem. Rev. 117(2017) 12942-13038.  doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00088

    13. [13]

      M. Zhou, S. Dong, Acc. Chem. Res. 44(2011) 1232-1243.  doi: 10.1021/ar200096g

    14. [14]

      S. Cheng, S. Hideshima, S. Kuroiwa, T. Nakanishi, T. Osaka, Sens. Actuators B 212(2015) 329-334.  doi: 10.1016/j.snb.2015.02.038

    15. [15]

      D. Li, L. Liang, Y. Tang, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 30(2019) 1013-1016.  doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2018.12.022

    16. [16]

      F. Yan, M. Zhang, J. Li, Adv. Healthcare Mater. 3(2013) 313-331.
       

    17. [17]

      Y.B. Yang, X.D. Yang, X.M. Zou, et al., Adv. Funct. Mater. 27(2017)1604096.  doi: 10.1002/adfm.201604096

    18. [18]

      J.C. Chou, M.S. Huan, Y.H. Liao, et al., Mater. Lett. 176(2016) 94-96.  doi: 10.1016/j.matlet.2016.04.092

    19. [19]

      X. Yu, T.J. Marks, A. Facchetti, Nat. Mater. 15(2016) 383-396.  doi: 10.1038/nmat4599

    20. [20]

      H. Chen, Y. Cao, J. Zhang, et al., Nat. Commun. 5(2014) 4097.  doi: 10.1038/ncomms5097

    21. [21]

      X. Du, Y. Li, J.R. Motley, et al., ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 8(2016) 7631-7637.  doi: 10.1021/acsami.5b12058

    22. [22]

      Y. Cui, Q. Wei, H. Park, C.M. Lieber, Science 293(2001) 1289-1292.  doi: 10.1126/science.1062711

    23. [23]

      H. Chen, Y.S. Rim, I.C. Wang, et al., ACS Nano 11(2017) 4710-4718.  doi: 10.1021/acsnano.7b00628

    24. [24]

      T. Kamiya, K. Nomura, H. Hosono, Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. 11(2010)044305.  doi: 10.1088/1468-6996/11/4/044305

    25. [25]

      A. Abliz, D. Wan, J.Y. Chen, et al., IEEE T. Electron. Dev. 20(2018) 1-6.

    26. [26]

      S. Jeong, Y. Park, Y. Cho, et al., Clin. Chim. Acta 414(2012) 93-100.  doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2012.08.018

    27. [27]

      M.H. Lee, J.L. Thomas, Y.C. Chang, et al., Biosens. Bioelectron. 79(2016) 789-795.  doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2016.01.005

    1. [1]

      A.K. Schneider, M.F. Chevalier, L. Derré, Nat. Rev. Urol. 16(2019) 613-630.  doi: 10.1038/s41585-019-0226-y

    2. [2]

      S. Antoni, J. Ferlay, I. Soerjomataram, A. Znaor, A. Jemal, F. Bray, Eur. Urol. 71(2017) 96-108.  doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.06.010

    3. [3]

      B.W.G. van Rhijn, H.G. van der Poel, T.H. van der Kwast, Eur. Urol. 47(2005) 736-748.  doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2005.03.014

    4. [4]

      X. Zhang, Y. Zhang, X. Liu, et al., Oncotarget 7(2015) 3255-3266.
       

    5. [5]

      S. Goodison, C.J. Rosser, V. Urquidi, Mol. Diagn. Ther. 17(2013) 71-84.  doi: 10.1007/s40291-013-0023-x

    6. [6]

      A. Mitra, R. Cote, Nat. Rev. Urol. 7(2010) 11-20.  doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2009.236

    7. [7]

      S. Jeong, Y. Park, Y. Cho, Y.R. Kim, H. Kim, Clin. Chim. Acta 414(2012) 93-100.  doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2012.08.018

    8. [8]

      K.K. Pasikanti, K. Esuvaranathan, P.C. Ho, et al., J. Proteome Res. 9(2010) 2988-2995.  doi: 10.1021/pr901173v

    9. [9]

      A. Sreekumar, L. Poisson, T. Rajendiran, et al., Nature 457(2009) 910-914.  doi: 10.1038/nature07762

    10. [10]

      G.Siravegna, S.Marsoni, S. Siena, et al., Nat.Rev.Clin.Oncol.14(2017) 531-548.  doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2017.14

    11. [11]

      E. Crowley, F.D. Nicolantonio, F. Loupakis, A. Bardelli, Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 10(2013) 472-484.  doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2013.110

    12. [12]

      S. Zhang, R. Geryak, J. Geldmeier, et al., Chem. Rev. 117(2017) 12942-13038.  doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00088

    13. [13]

      M. Zhou, S. Dong, Acc. Chem. Res. 44(2011) 1232-1243.  doi: 10.1021/ar200096g

    14. [14]

      S. Cheng, S. Hideshima, S. Kuroiwa, T. Nakanishi, T. Osaka, Sens. Actuators B 212(2015) 329-334.  doi: 10.1016/j.snb.2015.02.038

    15. [15]

      D. Li, L. Liang, Y. Tang, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 30(2019) 1013-1016.  doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2018.12.022

    16. [16]

      F. Yan, M. Zhang, J. Li, Adv. Healthcare Mater. 3(2013) 313-331.
       

    17. [17]

      Y.B. Yang, X.D. Yang, X.M. Zou, et al., Adv. Funct. Mater. 27(2017)1604096.  doi: 10.1002/adfm.201604096

    18. [18]

      J.C. Chou, M.S. Huan, Y.H. Liao, et al., Mater. Lett. 176(2016) 94-96.  doi: 10.1016/j.matlet.2016.04.092

    19. [19]

      X. Yu, T.J. Marks, A. Facchetti, Nat. Mater. 15(2016) 383-396.  doi: 10.1038/nmat4599

    20. [20]

      H. Chen, Y. Cao, J. Zhang, et al., Nat. Commun. 5(2014) 4097.  doi: 10.1038/ncomms5097

    21. [21]

      X. Du, Y. Li, J.R. Motley, et al., ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 8(2016) 7631-7637.  doi: 10.1021/acsami.5b12058

    22. [22]

      Y. Cui, Q. Wei, H. Park, C.M. Lieber, Science 293(2001) 1289-1292.  doi: 10.1126/science.1062711

    23. [23]

      H. Chen, Y.S. Rim, I.C. Wang, et al., ACS Nano 11(2017) 4710-4718.  doi: 10.1021/acsnano.7b00628

    24. [24]

      T. Kamiya, K. Nomura, H. Hosono, Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. 11(2010)044305.  doi: 10.1088/1468-6996/11/4/044305

    25. [25]

      A. Abliz, D. Wan, J.Y. Chen, et al., IEEE T. Electron. Dev. 20(2018) 1-6.

    26. [26]

      S. Jeong, Y. Park, Y. Cho, et al., Clin. Chim. Acta 414(2012) 93-100.  doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2012.08.018

    27. [27]

      M.H. Lee, J.L. Thomas, Y.C. Chang, et al., Biosens. Bioelectron. 79(2016) 789-795.  doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2016.01.005

  • 加载中
    1. [1]

      Xiangqian CaoChenkai YangXiaodong ZhuMengxin ZhaoYilin YanZhengnan HuangJinming CaiJingming ZhuangShengzhou LiWei LiBing Shen . Synergistic enhancement of chemotherapy for bladder cancer by photothermal dual-sensitive nanosystem with gold nanoparticles and PNIPAM. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2024, 35(8): 109199-. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2023.109199

    2. [2]

      Min ChenBoyu PengXuyun GuoYe ZhuHanying Li . Polyethylene interfacial dielectric layer for organic semiconductor single crystal based field-effect transistors. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2024, 35(4): 109051-. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2023.109051

    3. [3]

      Jing ChenPeisi XiePengfei WuYu HeZian LinZongwei Cai . MALDI coupled with laser-postionization and trapped ion mobility spectrometry contribute to the enhanced detection of lipids in cancer cell spheroids. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2024, 35(4): 108895-. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2023.108895

    4. [4]

      Gaojian YangZhiyang LiRabia UsmanZhu ChenYuan LiuSong LiHui ChenYan DengYile FangNongyue He . DNA walker induced "signal on" fluorescence aptasensor strategy for rapid and sensitive detection of extracellular vesicles in gastric cancer. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2025, 36(2): 109930-. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2024.109930

    5. [5]

      Xinyue HanYunhan YangJiayin LuYuxiang LinDongxue ZhangLing LinLiang Qiao . Efficient serum lipids profiling by TiO2-dopamin-assisted MALDI-TOF MS for breast cancer detection. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2025, 36(5): 110183-. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2024.110183

    6. [6]

      Ting-Ting HuangJin-Fa ChenJuan LiuTai-Bao WeiHong YaoBingbing ShiQi Lin . A novel fused bi-macrocyclic host for sensitive detection of Cr2O72− based on enrichment effect. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2024, 35(7): 109281-. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2023.109281

    7. [7]

      Min HuangRu ChengShuai WenLiangtong LiJie GaoXiaohui ZhaoChunmei LiHongyan ZouJian Wang . Ultrasensitive detection of microRNA-21 in human serum based on the confinement effect enhanced chemical etching of gold nanorods. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2024, 35(9): 109379-. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2023.109379

    8. [8]

      Tong TongLezong ChenSiying WuZhong CaoYuanbin SongJun Wu . Establishment of a leucine-based poly(ester amide)s library with self-anticancer effect as nano-drug carrier for colorectal cancer treatment. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2024, 35(12): 109689-. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2024.109689

    9. [9]

      Cheng GuoXiaoxiao ZhangXiujuan HongYiqiu HuLingna MaoKezhi Jiang . Graphene as adsorbent for highly efficient extraction of modified nucleosides in urine prior to liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry analysis. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2024, 35(4): 108867-. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2023.108867

    10. [10]

      Junjie WangYan WangZhengdong LiChangqiang XieMusammir KhanXingzhou PengFabiao Yu . Triphenylamine-AIEgens photoactive materials for cancer theranostics. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2024, 35(6): 108934-. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2023.108934

    11. [11]

      Rui WangYang LiangJulius Rebek Jr.Yang Yu . Stabilization and detection of labile reaction intermediates in supramolecular containers. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2024, 35(6): 109228-. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2023.109228

    12. [12]

      Zihong LiJie ChengPing HuangGuoliang WuWeiying Lin . Activatable photoacoustic bioprobe for visual detection of aging in vivo. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2024, 35(4): 109153-. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2023.109153

    13. [13]

      Huijie AnChen YangZhihui JiangJunjie YuanZhongming QiuLonghao ChenXin ChenMutu HuangLinlang HuangHongju LinBiao ChengHongjiang LiuZhiqiang Yu . Luminescence-activated Pt(Ⅳ) prodrug for in situ triggerable cancer therapy. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2024, 35(7): 109134-. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2023.109134

    14. [14]

      Mengjuan SunMuye ZhouYifang XiaoHailei TangJinhua ChenRuitao ZhangChunjiayu LiQi YaQian ChenJiasheng TuQiyue WangChunmeng Sun . Reversibly size-switchable polyion complex micelles for antiangiogenic cancer therapy. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2024, 35(7): 109110-. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2023.109110

    15. [15]

      Haijing CuiWeihao ZhuChuning YueMing YangWenzhi RenAiguo Wu . Recent progress of ultrasound-responsive titanium dioxide sonosensitizers in cancer treatment. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2024, 35(10): 109727-. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2024.109727

    16. [16]

      Xiaofang LuoYe WuXiaokun ZhangMin TangFeiye JuZuodong QinGregory J DunsWei-Dong ZhangJiang-Jiang QinXin Luan . Peptide-based strategies for overcoming multidrug-resistance in cancer therapy. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2025, 36(1): 109724-. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2024.109724

    17. [17]

      Yufang GAONan HOUYaning LIANGNing LIYanting ZHANGZelong LIXiaofeng LI . Nano-thin layer MCM-22 zeolite: Synthesis and catalytic properties of trimethylbenzene isomerization reaction. Chinese Journal of Inorganic Chemistry, 2024, 40(6): 1079-1087. doi: 10.11862/CJIC.20240036

    18. [18]

      Zheng-Biao ZouTai-Zong WuChun-Lan XieYuan WangYan LiGang ZhangRong ChaoLian-Zhong LuoLi-Sheng LiXian-Wen Yangneo-Dicitrinols A–C: Unprecedented PKS-NRPS hybrid citrinin dimers with ferroptosis inhibitory activity from the deep-sea-derived Penicillium citrinum W22. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2024, 35(12): 109723-. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2024.109723

    19. [19]

      Tiankai SunHui MinZongsu HanLiang WangPeng ChengWei Shi . Rapid detection of nanoplastic particles by a luminescent Tb-based coordination polymer. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2024, 35(5): 108718-. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2023.108718

    20. [20]

      Yuxin XiaoXiaowei WangYutong YinFangchao YinJinchao LiZhiyuan HouMashooq KhanRusong ZhaoWenli WuQiongzheng Hu . Distance-based lateral flow biosensor for the quantitative detection of bacterial endotoxin. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2024, 35(12): 109718-. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2024.109718

Metrics
  • PDF Downloads(46)
  • Abstract views(2185)
  • HTML views(93)

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索
Address:Zhongguancun North First Street 2,100190 Beijing, PR China Tel: +86-010-82449177-888
Powered By info@rhhz.net

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return