Citation: Pak Chanho, Woo Lee Seung, Baik Chaekyung, Ho Lee Bong, Jong You Dae, You Eunyoung. New strategy for reversal tolerant anode for automotive polymer electrolyte fuel cell[J]. Chinese Chemical Letters, ;2019, 30(6): 1186-1189. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2019.02.020 shu

New strategy for reversal tolerant anode for automotive polymer electrolyte fuel cell

    * Corresponding authors.
    E-mail addresses: Chanho.pak@gist.ac.kr (C. Pak), eunyoung.you@mobis.co.kr (E. You)
  • Received Date: 8 January 2019
    Revised Date: 6 February 2019
    Accepted Date: 21 February 2019
    Available Online: 22 June 2019

Figures(4)

  • Since the commercialization of the fuel cell electric vehicles (FCEVs), the polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell system has been actively improved as a powertrain for ultimate environment-friendly vehicle. During the FCEV operation, various transient conditions such as start-up/shut-down and fuel starvation occur irregularly, which deteriorates the durability of the membrane electrode assembly. In particular, when fuel starvation occurs, the carbon support in the anode is oxidized within few minutes, thus the mitigation of this phenomenon is essential for securing the durability. This short review introduces the concept of reversal tolerant anode (RTA), which is a mitigation method using an oxygen evolution catalyst and reviews some previous reports. In addition, new approach for RTA suggested by authors recently, which is the replacement of Pt anode catalyst by multifunctional IrRu alloy catalyst that simultaneously exhibits the activities for the hydrogen oxidation reaction and the oxygen evolution reaction is introduced.
  • Efficient synthesis of novel macrocyclic hosts with unique structures and good host–guest properties is a permanent and challenging topic in the field of supramolecular chemistry [1-7]. During the last decade, considerable effort has been devoted to the development of macrocyclic molecular and a number of new macrocyclic receptors with novel properties have been reported, such as heterocalix[n]aromatics [8-10], pillar[n]arene [11-16], helicarenes [17-19], naphthotubes [20-24], Ex-box and Ex-cage [25-32], and others [33-37]. However, most of the reported macrocyclic hosts showed poor solubility and weak host–guest interactions in water. To develop a new macrocyclic molecule with good water solubility and molecular recognition properties not only helps us to understand and mimic the biological processes, but also enriches the toolbox of supramolecular chemists. Water soluble groups including sulfonate [38-40], carboxylate [41-43] and quaternary amine groups [44, 45] have been modified onto the macrocyclic hosts to increase their water solubility. These approaches often suffer from long synthetic steps and low yields, which restrict their further application in the complicated supramolecular self-assembly. Undoubtedly, it is important to develop novel water-soluble macrocyclic hosts that could be obtained in high yields and show good host–guest properties in water. Recently, Li and coworkers [46, 47] reported the efficient synthesis of water-soluble macrocyclic hosts using dynamic covalent chemistry (DCC) approach. In their method, both macrocycles and [2] catenanes could be obtained in high yields under the thermodynamic control. However, the purification of [2] catenanes need chromatographic. Previously, our group [42, 43] prepared a novel water-soluble cylindrical macrotricyclic host, and found that the host could bind two N-methylquinolinium salts to form 1:2 complexes in water. Inspired by these results, we deduced that whether we could find a new strategy to construct novel water-soluble macrocyclic host with significant host–guest properties in high yields.

    So far as we know, 1, 8-bis(4-pyridylethynyl)anthracene, which looks like a molecule "clip", has been used as donor building block to prepare trigonal prisms [48]. Thus, the anthracene-based "clip" could also serve as half part of a macrocycle and a macrocyclic host could be obtained when a suitable building block was introduced to this clip. Herein, we report the efficient synthesis of a novel water soluble macrocyclic host 12+·2Br and its complexation with neutral guests in water. By the utilization of the anthracene-based "clip" to react with 1, 4-bis(bromomethyl)benzene, host 12+·2Br can be obtain via simple filtration in a high yield of 82%. Moreover, it was found that host 12+·2Br could form 1:1 complexes with guests 2 and 3 in water solution (Fig. 1). Interestingly, we discovered that host 12+·2Br could only selectively accommodate naphthalene among a variety of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in water. This selective host-guest recognition could be employed for the further removal of naphthalene from sewage.

    Figure 1

    Figure 1.  Structures and the proton designations of host 12+·2Br, guests 2 and 3.

    Synthesis of host 12+·2Br was outlined in Scheme 1. Compound 4 was first prepared according to the literature procedure [48]. By the reaction of 4 and commercially available 1, 4-bis(bromomethyl)benzene in acetonitrile at 90 ℃, host 12+·2Br could be easily synthesized in 82% yield. Macrocyclic host 12+·2Br showed moderate solubility in water, and its structure was confirmed by 1H NMR, 13C NMR, HRMS spectra and crystal structure analysis (Supporting information).

    Scheme 1

    Scheme 1.  Synthesis of host 12+·2Br.

    Firstly, the binding properties of host 12+·2Br toward neutral guests 2 and 3 were investigated by 1H NMR spectra in water solution. Unlike the previous results that reported by our group [43], after electron-poor host 12+·2Br (4.0 mmol/L) and electron-rich guest 2 with 1:1 molar ratio were mixed in water, no obviously color change was observed. The similar phenomenon was also observed for the aqueous solution between host 12+·2Br and guests 3. These results led us to doubt that whether host 12+·2Br could form of complexes with guests 2 and 3. Consequently, the 1H NMR experiments were carried out to further investigate the complexation between host 12+·2Br and guest 2 in water. As shown in Fig. 2, the 1H NMR spectrum of a 1:1 mixture of 12+·2Br and 2 in D2O showed a great difference with those for free host 12+·2Br and free guest 2. Upfield shifts of the resonances of protons H1, H2 and H3 corresponding to guest 2 were observed, which indicated that the naphthalene unit of 2 experienced a shielded magnetic environment in the aromatic cavity of 12+·2Br. Moreover, the signal of protons Hf and Hg in host 12+·2Br also shifted upfield, implying that the electron-poor pyridine unit of 12+·2Br was in shielded magnetic environment and a new complex 1·2 could be formed. Meanwhile, by increasing the amount of guest 2, the spectrum of complex 1·2 showed only one set of resonances, which indicated that the complexation and decomplexation between host 12+·2Br and guest 2 were a fast exchange process on the NMR time scale at room temperature. The formation of complex 1·2 was also supported by 2D NOESY spectral experiment. As shown in the Fig. S4 (Supporting information), the clear correlation signals between protons H1-Hg, H2-Hg and the protons of crown ether units of host 12+·2Br were observed, which was also consistent with the formation of complex 1·2. Moreover, 1H NMR titrations and nonlinear fitting were then performed to quantitatively estimate the 1:1 binding manner between host 12+·2Br and guest 2. Consequently, it was found that 1:1 complex 1·2 were formed by the mole ratio plot. The binding constant (K) of the complex 212+·2Br was calculated to be 184±4 L/mol by the Scatchard plot [49]. By the counteranion exchange of 12+·2Br, we also prepared oil-soluble 12+·2PF6 and investigated its complexation with 2 in MeCN. As shown in Fig. S3 (Supporting information), the 1H NMR spectrum of the 1:1 mixture of 12+·2PF6 and 2 was essentially the sum of the two components, indicating that no obvious complexation between 12+·2PF6 and 2 occurred and the major driving force for the formation of 212+·2Br in water could be hydrophobic interactions. In addition, the binding constant of the complex 312+·2Br was measured to be around 64±2 L/mol in D2O at 298 K. Compared to guest 2 containing a naphthalene unit, guest 3 has a smaller phenyl hydrophobic moiety, which accounted for its lower binding constant within host 12+·2Br.

    Figure 2

    Figure 2.  Partial 1H NMR spectra (400 MHz, D2O, 295 K) of (a) free guest 2, (b) 12+·2Br and 1.0 equiv. of 2, (c) free host 12+·2Br. [12+·2Br]0=4.0 mmol/L.

    The attempts to obtain the single crystal of 212+·2Br and 12+·2Br were unsuccessful. Fortunately, a yellow single crystal of 12+·2PF6 was obtained by slow vapor diffusion of ether to a solution of 12+·2PF6 in CH3CN, providing unambiguous evidence for the formation of 12+·2Br. As shown in Fig. 3a, the two pyridinium residues orientate in a face-to-face nanner and the distance between two N and C atoms of pyridinium residues are measured to be 5.812 Å (h) and 5.647 Å (g), indicating the moderate-sized cavity of host 12+·2PF6. Interestingly, it was found that PF6 ion showed not only multiple CH···F hydrogen bonds but also anion···π interactions with pyridinium rings with the distance of 2.989 (d), 3.062 (e) and 3.159 (f), respectively. Moreover, π···π interaction between two anthracene groups of host 12+·2PF6 with a distance of 3.846 Å (i) was also observed (Fig. 3b). Because of these multiple noncovalent interactions, the macrocyclic molecule 12+·2PF6 could self-assemble to form a 1D tubular channel with PF6 ions inside the channels.

    Figure 3

    Figure 3.  Crystal structure of 12+·2PF6 (a). Crystal structure of self-assembly 12+·2PF6 side view (b), top view (c). Dashed lines denote the noncovalent interactions between the two components. CH···F hydrogen bond distances (Å): a=2.461, b=2.404, c=2.557. PF6 ions and hydrogen atoms not involved in the noncovalent interactions are omitted for clarity.

    Inspired by the formation of complex 1·2 in water, we further investigated the capability of 12+·2Br to accommodate a variety of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in water. As shown in Fig. 4a, 1H NMR spectroscopy revealed that 12+·2Br can encapsulate naphthalene to formation of 1:1 complex. However, the formation of 1:1 complexes between 12+·2Br and anthracene, phenanthrene, triphenylene, pyrene and perylene were not observed (Figs. 4b–f). These observations could be explained by the fact that host 12+·2Br had a small cavity and could only recognize small polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons such as naphthalene. However, because of the extremely poor solubility of naphthalene in water, the corresponding binding constants of host 12+·2Br and naphthalene could not be determined. The highly selective binding behavior of host 12+·2Br toward naphthalene could be further used for the separation of naphthalene from a variety of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons.

    Figure 4

    Figure 4.  Partial 1H NMR spectra (400 MHz, D2O, 298 K) of 12+·2Br after addition of a variety of water-insoluble guests including (a) naphthalene, (b) anthracene, (c) phenanthrene, (d) triphenylene, (e) pyrene and (f) perylene. All the spectra were recorded after sonicating the corresponding suspensions for no less than 24 h to allow the host–guest complexation to reach the equilibrium. The resonance signals of the guests are labelled with red arrows.

    In conclusion, by taking advantage of anthracene-based "clip" structure, we developed an efficient approach to construct a water-soluble macrocycle and studied its binding ability toward neutral guests containing naphthalene or phenyl units in water. The formation of 1:1 complexes between host 12+·2Br and 2 or 3 were confirmed by the 1H NMR titrations experiment. Additionally, we demonstrated that the major driving force for the formation of 212+·2Br or 312+·2Br in water might be hydrophobic interactions. We further investigated its ability to host a variety of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in aqueous solution. It was found that host 12+·2Br could selectively encapsulate of naphthalene to formation of 1:1 complexes over a variety of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. This highly selective accommodation hydrophobic guest in water could be explained by the fact that host 12+·2Br had a relatively small hydrophobic cavity. The application of this novel water-soluble host for the separation of naphthalene from a variety of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and removal of naphthalene from sewage, are underway in our laboratory.

    The authors report no declarations of interest.

    The authors are grateful for the financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 21602055 and 51772091); Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province (No. 2017JJ3094) and Research Foundation of Education Bureau of Hunan Province (No. 18C1072).

    Supplementary material related to this article can be found, in the online version, at doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cclet.2020.11.019.


    * Corresponding author.
    E-mail address: zengfei@iccas.ac.cn (F. Zeng).
    1. [1]

      Z.P. Cano, D. Banham, S. Ye, et al., Nature Ener. 3(2018) 279-289.  doi: 10.1038/s41560-018-0108-1

    2. [2]

      T. Wilberforce, Z. El-Hassan, F.N. Khatib, et al., Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 42(2017) 25695-25734.  doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.07.054

    3. [3]

      A. Alaswad, A. Baroutaji, H. Achour, et al., Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 41(2016) 16499-16508.  doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.03.164

    4. [4]

      B.K. Hong, S.H. Kim, ECS Trans. 86(2018) 3-11.

    5. [5]

      https://media.daimler.com/marsMediaSite/en/instance/ko/Mercedes-BenzGLC-F-CELL-Market-launch-of-the-worlds-first-electric-vehicle-featuringfuel-cell-and-plug-in-hybrid-technology.xhtml?oid=41813012.

    6. [6]

      A. Kongkanad, M.F. Mathias, J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 7(2016) 1127-1137.  doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.6b00216

    7. [7]

      T. Zhang, P. Wang, H. Chen, P. Pei, Acs Appl. Energy Mater. 223(2018) 249-262.

    8. [8]

      T. Mittermeier, A. Weiß, F. Hasché, G. Hübner, H.A. Gasteiger, J. Electrochem. Soc. 164(2017) F127-F137.  doi: 10.1149/2.1061702jes

    9. [9]

      G.S. Harzer, J.N. Schwämmlein, et al., J. Electrochem. Soc. 165(2018) F3118-F3131.  doi: 10.1149/2.0161806jes

    10. [10]

      H. Zhang, H. Haas, J. Hu, et al., J. Electrochem. Soc. 160(2013) F840-F847.  doi: 10.1149/2.083308jes

    11. [11]

      N. Macauley, D.D. Papadias, J. Fairweather, et al., J. Electrochem. Soc.165(2018) F3148-F3160.  doi: 10.1149/2.0061806jes

    12. [12]

      F. Forouzandeh, X. Li, D.W. Banham, et al., J. Electrochem. Soc. 165(2018) F3230-F3240.  doi: 10.1149/2.0261806jes

    13. [13]

      C. Qin, J. Wang, D. Yang, B. Li, C. Zhang, Catalysts 6(2016) 197-217.  doi: 10.3390/catal6120197

    14. [14]

      Ž. Penga, G. Radica, F. Barbir, P. Eckert, Degradation mechanisms in automotive fuel cell systems, FCHJU deliverable D1.3, (2018).

    15. [15]

      A. Taniguchi, T. Akita, K. Yasuda, Y. Miyazaki, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 33(2008) 2323-2329.  doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.02.049

    16. [16]

      A. Taniguchi, T. Akita, K. Yasuda, Y. Miyazaki, J. Power Sources 130(2004) 42-49.  doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2003.12.035

    17. [17]

      T.R. Ralph, M.P. Hogath, Platinum Metals Rev. 46(2002) 117-135.

    18. [18]

      B.K. Hong, P. Mandal, J.G. Oh, S. Lister, J. Power Sources 328(2016) 280-288.  doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.07.002

    19. [19]

      W.R.W. Daud, R.E. Rosli, E.H. Majlan, et al., Renew. Energy 113(2017) 620-638.  doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2017.06.027

    20. [20]

      J. Thangavelautham, Degradation in PEM fuel cells and mitigation strategies using system design and control, in: T. Taner (Ed.), Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell, Intech Open Ltd, London, 2018, pp. 63-95.

    21. [21]

      Y.B. Park, E. You, C. Pak, M. Min, Electrochim. Acta 284(2018) 242-252.  doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2018.07.171

    22. [22]

      W.S. Jung, B.N. Popov, Carbon 122(2017) 746-755.  doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2017.07.028

    23. [23]

      Y.J. Wang, B. Fang, H. Li, X. Bi, H. Wang, Prog. Mater. Sci. 82(2016) 445-498.  doi: 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2016.06.002

    24. [24]

      Y. Jeon, Y. Ji, Y.I. Cho, et al., ACS Nano 12(2018) 6819-6829.  doi: 10.1021/acsnano.8b02040

    25. [25]

      O. Lori, L. Elbaz, Catalysts 5(2015) 1445-1464.  doi: 10.3390/catal5031445

    26. [26]

      P. Mandal, B.K. Hong, J.G. Oh, S. Litster, J. Power Sources 397(2018) 397-404.  doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.06.083

    27. [27]

      K.H. Lim, W.H. Lee, Y. Jeong, H. Kim, J. Electrochem. Soc. 164(2017) F1580-F1586.  doi: 10.1149/2.0731714jes

    28. [28]

      T.R. Ralph, S. Hudson, D.P. Wilkinson, ECS Trans. 1(2006) 67-84.

    29. [29]

      Z. Zhu, X. Yan, H. Tang, et al., J. Power Sources 351(2017) 138-144.  doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.03.076

    30. [30]

      E. You, M. Min, S.A. Jin, T. Kim, C. Pak, J. Electrochem. Soc. 165(2018) F3094-F3099.  doi: 10.1149/2.0121806jes

    31. [31]

      S.D. Knights, D.P. Wilkinson, S.A. Campbell, et al., Patent PCT WO 01/15247 A2, (2001).

    32. [32]

      J.L. Taylor, D.P. Wilkinson, D.S. Wainwright, T.R. Ralph, S.D. Knights, Patent PCT WO 01/15249 A2, (2001).

    33. [33]

      S. Ye, P. Beattie, S. A. Campbell, et al., Patent, US 2004/0013935 A1, 2004.

    34. [34]

      S. Ye, Reversal-tolerant catalyst layers, in: J. Zhang (Ed.), PEM Fuel Cell Electrocatalysts and Catalyst Layers, Fundamentals and Applications, SpringerVerlag Ltd., London, 2008835-680.

    35. [35]

      T. Yasuda, A. Ogawa, M. Kanno, et al., Chem. Lett. 38(2009) 692-693.  doi: 10.1246/cl.2009.692

    36. [36]

      G.G. Eshetu, M. Armand, H. Ohno, B. Scrosati, S. Passerini, Energy Environ. Sci. 9(2016) 49-61.  doi: 10.1039/C5EE02284C

    37. [37]

      A.R. Neale, P. Li, J. Jacquemin, et al., Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 18(2016) 11251-11262.  doi: 10.1039/C5CP07160G

    38. [38]

      C. Pozo-Gonzalo, M. Kar, E. Jónsson, et al., Electrochim. Acta 196(2016) 727-734.  doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2016.02.208

    39. [39]

      E. You, S.W. Lee, C. Pak, Development and application of cell reversal durable, carbon supported anode catalysts for membrane electrode assembly of automotive PEMFC, International Symposium on Advancement and Prospect of Catalysis Science (2018) 25-27.

    40. [40]

      D.A. Stevens, R.J. Sanderson, T.D. Hatchard, et al., ECS Trans. 33(2010) 419-423.

    41. [41]

      D.A. Cullen, K.L. More, K.S. Reeves, et al., ECS Trans. 41(2011) 1099-1103.

    42. [42]

      J. Durst, A. Orfanidi, P.J. Rheinländer, et al., ECS Trans. 69(2015) 67-76.

    43. [43]

      S.A. Jin, C. Pak, D. J. Yoo, K. H. Lee, Patent, US 2013/0137009 A1, 2013.

    44. [44]

      D.J. You, D.H. Kim, J.R. De Lile, et al., Appl. Catal. A:General 562(2018) 250-257.  doi: 10.1016/j.apcata.2018.06.018

    45. [45]

      http://www.platinum.matthey.com/prices/price-charts.

    1. [1]

      Z.P. Cano, D. Banham, S. Ye, et al., Nature Ener. 3(2018) 279-289.  doi: 10.1038/s41560-018-0108-1

    2. [2]

      T. Wilberforce, Z. El-Hassan, F.N. Khatib, et al., Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 42(2017) 25695-25734.  doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.07.054

    3. [3]

      A. Alaswad, A. Baroutaji, H. Achour, et al., Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 41(2016) 16499-16508.  doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.03.164

    4. [4]

      B.K. Hong, S.H. Kim, ECS Trans. 86(2018) 3-11.

    5. [5]

      https://media.daimler.com/marsMediaSite/en/instance/ko/Mercedes-BenzGLC-F-CELL-Market-launch-of-the-worlds-first-electric-vehicle-featuringfuel-cell-and-plug-in-hybrid-technology.xhtml?oid=41813012.

    6. [6]

      A. Kongkanad, M.F. Mathias, J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 7(2016) 1127-1137.  doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.6b00216

    7. [7]

      T. Zhang, P. Wang, H. Chen, P. Pei, Acs Appl. Energy Mater. 223(2018) 249-262.

    8. [8]

      T. Mittermeier, A. Weiß, F. Hasché, G. Hübner, H.A. Gasteiger, J. Electrochem. Soc. 164(2017) F127-F137.  doi: 10.1149/2.1061702jes

    9. [9]

      G.S. Harzer, J.N. Schwämmlein, et al., J. Electrochem. Soc. 165(2018) F3118-F3131.  doi: 10.1149/2.0161806jes

    10. [10]

      H. Zhang, H. Haas, J. Hu, et al., J. Electrochem. Soc. 160(2013) F840-F847.  doi: 10.1149/2.083308jes

    11. [11]

      N. Macauley, D.D. Papadias, J. Fairweather, et al., J. Electrochem. Soc.165(2018) F3148-F3160.  doi: 10.1149/2.0061806jes

    12. [12]

      F. Forouzandeh, X. Li, D.W. Banham, et al., J. Electrochem. Soc. 165(2018) F3230-F3240.  doi: 10.1149/2.0261806jes

    13. [13]

      C. Qin, J. Wang, D. Yang, B. Li, C. Zhang, Catalysts 6(2016) 197-217.  doi: 10.3390/catal6120197

    14. [14]

      Ž. Penga, G. Radica, F. Barbir, P. Eckert, Degradation mechanisms in automotive fuel cell systems, FCHJU deliverable D1.3, (2018).

    15. [15]

      A. Taniguchi, T. Akita, K. Yasuda, Y. Miyazaki, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 33(2008) 2323-2329.  doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.02.049

    16. [16]

      A. Taniguchi, T. Akita, K. Yasuda, Y. Miyazaki, J. Power Sources 130(2004) 42-49.  doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2003.12.035

    17. [17]

      T.R. Ralph, M.P. Hogath, Platinum Metals Rev. 46(2002) 117-135.

    18. [18]

      B.K. Hong, P. Mandal, J.G. Oh, S. Lister, J. Power Sources 328(2016) 280-288.  doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.07.002

    19. [19]

      W.R.W. Daud, R.E. Rosli, E.H. Majlan, et al., Renew. Energy 113(2017) 620-638.  doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2017.06.027

    20. [20]

      J. Thangavelautham, Degradation in PEM fuel cells and mitigation strategies using system design and control, in: T. Taner (Ed.), Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell, Intech Open Ltd, London, 2018, pp. 63-95.

    21. [21]

      Y.B. Park, E. You, C. Pak, M. Min, Electrochim. Acta 284(2018) 242-252.  doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2018.07.171

    22. [22]

      W.S. Jung, B.N. Popov, Carbon 122(2017) 746-755.  doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2017.07.028

    23. [23]

      Y.J. Wang, B. Fang, H. Li, X. Bi, H. Wang, Prog. Mater. Sci. 82(2016) 445-498.  doi: 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2016.06.002

    24. [24]

      Y. Jeon, Y. Ji, Y.I. Cho, et al., ACS Nano 12(2018) 6819-6829.  doi: 10.1021/acsnano.8b02040

    25. [25]

      O. Lori, L. Elbaz, Catalysts 5(2015) 1445-1464.  doi: 10.3390/catal5031445

    26. [26]

      P. Mandal, B.K. Hong, J.G. Oh, S. Litster, J. Power Sources 397(2018) 397-404.  doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.06.083

    27. [27]

      K.H. Lim, W.H. Lee, Y. Jeong, H. Kim, J. Electrochem. Soc. 164(2017) F1580-F1586.  doi: 10.1149/2.0731714jes

    28. [28]

      T.R. Ralph, S. Hudson, D.P. Wilkinson, ECS Trans. 1(2006) 67-84.

    29. [29]

      Z. Zhu, X. Yan, H. Tang, et al., J. Power Sources 351(2017) 138-144.  doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.03.076

    30. [30]

      E. You, M. Min, S.A. Jin, T. Kim, C. Pak, J. Electrochem. Soc. 165(2018) F3094-F3099.  doi: 10.1149/2.0121806jes

    31. [31]

      S.D. Knights, D.P. Wilkinson, S.A. Campbell, et al., Patent PCT WO 01/15247 A2, (2001).

    32. [32]

      J.L. Taylor, D.P. Wilkinson, D.S. Wainwright, T.R. Ralph, S.D. Knights, Patent PCT WO 01/15249 A2, (2001).

    33. [33]

      S. Ye, P. Beattie, S. A. Campbell, et al., Patent, US 2004/0013935 A1, 2004.

    34. [34]

      S. Ye, Reversal-tolerant catalyst layers, in: J. Zhang (Ed.), PEM Fuel Cell Electrocatalysts and Catalyst Layers, Fundamentals and Applications, SpringerVerlag Ltd., London, 2008835-680.

    35. [35]

      T. Yasuda, A. Ogawa, M. Kanno, et al., Chem. Lett. 38(2009) 692-693.  doi: 10.1246/cl.2009.692

    36. [36]

      G.G. Eshetu, M. Armand, H. Ohno, B. Scrosati, S. Passerini, Energy Environ. Sci. 9(2016) 49-61.  doi: 10.1039/C5EE02284C

    37. [37]

      A.R. Neale, P. Li, J. Jacquemin, et al., Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 18(2016) 11251-11262.  doi: 10.1039/C5CP07160G

    38. [38]

      C. Pozo-Gonzalo, M. Kar, E. Jónsson, et al., Electrochim. Acta 196(2016) 727-734.  doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2016.02.208

    39. [39]

      E. You, S.W. Lee, C. Pak, Development and application of cell reversal durable, carbon supported anode catalysts for membrane electrode assembly of automotive PEMFC, International Symposium on Advancement and Prospect of Catalysis Science (2018) 25-27.

    40. [40]

      D.A. Stevens, R.J. Sanderson, T.D. Hatchard, et al., ECS Trans. 33(2010) 419-423.

    41. [41]

      D.A. Cullen, K.L. More, K.S. Reeves, et al., ECS Trans. 41(2011) 1099-1103.

    42. [42]

      J. Durst, A. Orfanidi, P.J. Rheinländer, et al., ECS Trans. 69(2015) 67-76.

    43. [43]

      S.A. Jin, C. Pak, D. J. Yoo, K. H. Lee, Patent, US 2013/0137009 A1, 2013.

    44. [44]

      D.J. You, D.H. Kim, J.R. De Lile, et al., Appl. Catal. A:General 562(2018) 250-257.  doi: 10.1016/j.apcata.2018.06.018

    45. [45]

      http://www.platinum.matthey.com/prices/price-charts.

  • 加载中
    1. [1]

      Baokang GengXiang ChuLi LiuLingling ZhangShuaishuai ZhangXiao WangShuyan SongHongjie Zhang . High-efficiency PdNi single-atom alloy catalyst toward cross-coupling reaction. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2024, 35(7): 108924-. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2023.108924

    2. [2]

      Peng Wang Daijie Deng Suqin Wu Li Xu . Cobalt-based deep eutectic solvent modified nitrogen-doped carbon catalyst for boosting oxygen reduction reaction in zinc-air batteries. Chinese Journal of Structural Chemistry, 2024, 43(1): 100199-100199. doi: 10.1016/j.cjsc.2023.100199

    3. [3]

      Yanling YangZhenfa DingHuimin WangJianhui LiYanping ZhengHongquan GuoLi ZhangBing YangQingqing GuHaifeng XiongYifei Sun . Dynamic tracking of exsolved PdPt alloy/perovskite catalyst for efficient lean methane oxidation. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2024, 35(4): 108585-. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2023.108585

    4. [4]

      Mengxiang ZhuTao DingYunzhang LiYuanjie PengRuiping LiuQuan ZouLeilei YangShenglei SunPin ZhouGuosheng ShiDongting Yue . Graphene controlled solid-state growth of oxygen vacancies riched V2O5 catalyst to highly activate Fenton-like reaction. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2024, 35(12): 109833-. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2024.109833

    5. [5]

      Hong Yin Zhipeng Yu . Hexavalent iridium catalyst enhances efficiency of hydrogen production. Chinese Journal of Structural Chemistry, 2025, 44(1): 100382-100382. doi: 10.1016/j.cjsc.2024.100382

    6. [6]

      Jiawei GeXian WangHeyuan TianHao WanWei MaJiangying QuJunjie Ge . Iridium-based catalysts for oxygen evolution reaction in proton exchange membrane water electrolysis. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2025, 36(5): 109906-. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2024.109906

    7. [7]

      Yizhe ChenYuzhou JiaoLiangyu SunCheng YuanQian ShenPeng LiShiming ZhangJiujun Zhang . Nonmetallic phosphorus alloying to regulate the oxygen reduction mechanisms of platinum catalyst. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2025, 36(4): 110789-. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2024.110789

    8. [8]

      Jing CaoDezheng ZhangBianqing RenPing SongWeilin Xu . Mn incorporated RuO2 nanocrystals as an efficient and stable bifunctional electrocatalyst for oxygen evolution reaction and hydrogen evolution reaction in acid and alkaline. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2024, 35(10): 109863-. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2024.109863

    9. [9]

      Xiao LiWanqiang YuYujie WangRuiying LiuQingquan YuRiming HuXuchuan JiangQingsheng GaoHong LiuJiayuan YuWeijia Zhou . Metal-encapsulated nitrogen-doped carbon nanotube arrays electrode for enhancing sulfion oxidation reaction and hydrogen evolution reaction by regulating of intermediate adsorption. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2024, 35(8): 109166-. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2023.109166

    10. [10]

      Fenglin WangChengwei KuangZhicheng ZhengDan WuHao WanGen ChenNing ZhangXiaohe LiuRenzhi Ma . Noble metal clusters substitution in porous Ni substrate renders high mass-specific activities toward oxygen evolution reaction and methanol oxidation reaction. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2025, 36(6): 109989-. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2024.109989

    11. [11]

      Gang HuChun WangQinqin WangMingyuan ZhuLihua Kang . The controlled oxidation states of the H4PMo11VO40 catalyst induced by plasma for the selective oxidation of methacrolein. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2025, 36(2): 110298-. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2024.110298

    12. [12]

      Hao WANGKun TANGJiangyang SHAOKezhi WANGYuwu ZHONG . Electro-copolymerized film of ruthenium catalyst and redox mediator for electrocatalytic water oxidation. Chinese Journal of Inorganic Chemistry, 2024, 40(11): 2193-2202. doi: 10.11862/CJIC.20240176

    13. [13]

      Kexin YinJingren YangYanwei LiQian LiXing Xu . Metal-free diatomaceous carbon-based catalyst for ultrafast and anti-interference Fenton-like oxidation. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2024, 35(12): 109847-. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2024.109847

    14. [14]

      Meng WangYan ZhangYunbo YuWenpo ShanHong He . High-temperature calcination dramatically promotes the activity of Cs/Co/Ce-Sn catalyst for soot oxidation. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2025, 36(1): 109928-. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2024.109928

    15. [15]

      Fangwen Peng Zhen Luo Yingjin Ma Haibo Ma . Theoretical study of aromaticity reversal in dimethyldihydropyrene derivatives. Chinese Journal of Structural Chemistry, 2024, 43(5): 100273-100273. doi: 10.1016/j.cjsc.2024.100273

    16. [16]

      Ling Tang Yan Wan Yangming Lin . Lowering the kinetic barrier via enhancing electrophilicity of surface oxygen to boost acidic oxygen evolution reaction. Chinese Journal of Structural Chemistry, 2024, 43(11): 100345-100345. doi: 10.1016/j.cjsc.2024.100345

    17. [17]

      Xiaoya CuiYanchang LiuQiang LiHe ZhuShibo XiJianrong Zeng . Ultrafast crystallinity engineering of PtCo3 alloy for enhanced oxygen reduction reaction. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2025, 36(5): 110069-. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2024.110069

    18. [18]

      Jiayu XuMeng LiBaoxia DongLigang Feng . Fully fluorinated hybrid zeolite imidazole/Prussian blue analogs with combined advantages for efficient oxygen evolution reaction. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2024, 35(6): 108798-. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2023.108798

    19. [19]

      Qiyan WuRuixin ZhouZhangyi YaoTanyuan WangQing Li . Effective approaches for enhancing the stability of ruthenium-based electrocatalysts towards acidic oxygen evolution reaction. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2024, 35(10): 109416-. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2023.109416

    20. [20]

      Junan PanXinyi LiuHuachao JiYanwei ZhuYanling ZhuangKang ChenNing SunYongqi LiuYunchao LeiKun WangBao ZangLonglu Wang . The strategies to improve TMDs represented by MoS2 electrocatalytic oxygen evolution reaction. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2024, 35(11): 109515-. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2024.109515

Metrics
  • PDF Downloads(3)
  • Abstract views(948)
  • HTML views(9)

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索
Address:Zhongguancun North First Street 2,100190 Beijing, PR China Tel: +86-010-82449177-888
Powered By info@rhhz.net

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return